Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,67585) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SILICKIS AND SILICKIENE v. LITHUANIA
Art. 2, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 20496/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02
However, the Court considers that this remedy was insufficient for the respondent State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention in the present case, in that it was aimed at awarding damages rather than identifying and punishing those responsible (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, §§ 81-83 ECHR 2000-VII, and, mutatis mutandis, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3286, § 85). - EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91
AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02
In any event, the confiscation of part of the family's property had been in accordance with domestic law (Article 72 of the Criminal Code) and amounted to a justified control of the use of property in the general interest, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, amongst others, Jarvi-Eristys Oy v. Finland, no. 41674/98, decision of 15 March 2005, and Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, 5 May 1995, Series A no. 316-A). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02
Whilst under house arrest, the first applicant had continued enjoying a social life, living with his family and receiving visits (see, a contrario, Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39). - EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87
RAIMONDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 20496/02
In the interests of crime prevention, the State had a wide margin of appreciation in controlling property obtained by unlawful means or used for unlawful purposes (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A).