Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66877) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MINHAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 40461/98
LEWIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
The Court recalls that the right to an adversarial trial under Article 6 requires that the prosecution disclose to the defence all material evidence in their possession for or against the accused (see Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, § 46, ECHR 2004-X). - EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 19955/05
GRAYSON AND BARNHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
Article 6 § 1, which applies throughout the entirety of proceedings for "the determination of... any criminal charge", including proceedings whereby a sentence is fixed, was therefore applicable (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 39, ECHR 2001-VII; and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 37, 23 September 2008). - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 6 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34; and Grayson and Barnham, cited above, § 42). - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
The presumption of innocence and the notion of a fair trial require that the burden of proof must generally fall on the prosecution in criminal proceedings (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146). - EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83
SALABIAKU c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
Accordingly, the Convention does not prohibit presumptions of fact or law that may operate against an accused, but any such presumptions must be confined within reasonable limits which take into account the importance of what is at stake and maintain the rights of the defence (see Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, § 28, Series A no. 141-A).