Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,36145) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LEONTE v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LEONTE v. ROMANIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10
Where an applicant has failed to comply with these requirements, his or her application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 66; Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 72; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10
Where an applicant has failed to comply with these requirements, his or her application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 66; Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 72; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10
Where an applicant has failed to comply with these requirements, his or her application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 66; Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 72; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007). - EGMR, 08.03.2007 - 18712/03
THIERMANN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 23931/10
Where an applicant has failed to comply with these requirements, his or her application should in principle be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, for example, Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 66; Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 72; Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200, and Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007).