Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GASIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GASIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13

  LARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The same standards also apply to investigations in cases where a person dies in suspicious circumstances in which the State's positive obligation under Article 2 is at stake (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 102, 17 December 2009, and Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015).
• EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06

  TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  In all cases, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to such an extent as is necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 76, 15 February 2011).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 88, ECHR 1999-III).

 
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05

  MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The same standards also apply to investigations in cases where a person dies in suspicious circumstances in which the State's positive obligation under Article 2 is at stake (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 102, 17 December 2009, and Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  Whatever mode is employed, the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, § 63).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, 15 January 2009).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09

  The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, 15 January 2009).