Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• lto.de (Kurzinformation)

  Russland muss Nawalny Entschädigung zahlen

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 75734/12

  RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  The background facts relating to the planning, conduct and dispersal of the demonstration at Bolotnaya Square are set out in more detail in Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, §§ 7-65, 5 January 2016); Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia (nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 7-33, 4 October 2016); and Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia (nos. 75734/12 and 2 others, §§ 8-31, 19 November 2019).

  In particular, as regards the first applicant, his taking part in the sit-in and the calls to the protesters to stay on the site of the cancelled meeting did not demonstrate any violent intentions on his part (see Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia, nos. 75734/12 and 2 others, § 285, 19 November 2019).

• EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  BORIS KOSTADINOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  The burden to prove that this was the case rests on the Government (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 53, 21 January 2016).

 
• EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 27473/02

  ERDOGAN YAGIZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  Moreover, the treatment in question took place in public in the presence of a large number of people and was reported in the media (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; and Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  However, such force may be used only if indispensable and must not be excessive (see Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  Moreover, the treatment in question took place in public in the presence of a large number of people and was reported in the media (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; and Erdogan Yagiz v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007).
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 31475/10

  ANNENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  In respect of recourse to physical force during an arrest, Article 3 does not prohibit the use of force for effecting a lawful arrest (see Annenkov and Others v. Russia, no. 31475/10, § 79, 25 July 2017).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 75186/12

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20

  MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Within this context, the Court takes note of the fact that all three applicants were represented by the lawyers of their choosing and were able to examine witnesses against them, including the relevant police officers (contrast and compare, Navalnyy and Gunko v. Russia, no. 75186/12, § 66, 10 November 2020).
• EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 3824/17

  GÜNGÖR c. TÜRKIYE

  Partant, eu égard à ce qui précède, la Cour conclut que la contrainte utilisée contre le requérant ne correspondait pas à une utilisation de la force physique rendue strictement nécessaire par son comportement (voir, entre autres, Bouyid, précité, § 111, Navalnyy et Gunko c. Russie, no 75186/12, § 48, 10 novembre 2020, et Ilievi et Ganchevi c. Bulgarie, nos 69154/11 et 69163/11, § 56, 8 juin 2021).