Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15528/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,31002) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOGOMOL v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BOGOMOL v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01
MERIT v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15528/11
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the light of its findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France ([GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II), Frydlender v. France ([GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII) and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15528/11
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the light of its findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France ([GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II), Frydlender v. France ([GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII) and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15528/11
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the light of its findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France ([GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II), Frydlender v. France ([GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII) and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004).