Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 31387/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68335) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASILCHUK v. UKRAINE
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98
JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 31387/05
The Court reiterates that its case-law has found that impossibility for an applicant to obtain enforcement of a judgment in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III; JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003; and Voytenko v. Ukraine, no. 18966/02, §§ 53-55, 29 June 2004). - EGMR, 29.06.2004 - 18966/02
VOYTENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 31387/05
The Court reiterates that its case-law has found that impossibility for an applicant to obtain enforcement of a judgment in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III; JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003; and Voytenko v. Ukraine, no. 18966/02, §§ 53-55, 29 June 2004).