Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEKVEDAVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Nekvedavicius v. Lithuania

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 1471/05
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 1471/05

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

  THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05

  The Court has so far considered that the right under Article 14 not to be discriminated against in the enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under the Convention is violated when States treat differently persons in analogous situations without providing an objective and reasonable justification (see Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV, and Wessels-Bergervoet v. the Netherlands, no. 34462/97, § 46, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05

  MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05

  In view of that judgment, the applicant's claim for restoration of his rights by means other than in natura constituted a "proprietary interest" which has a sufficient basis in domestic law and is covered by the notion of a "possession" under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention (see Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 52, ECHR 2004-IX, and Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, nos. 30767/05 and 33800/06, § 146, 12 October 2010).
• EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 57001/00

  STRAIN ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05

  The requisite balance will not be struck where the person concerned bears an individual and excessive burden (see Strain and Others v. Romania, no. 57001/00, § 44, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05

  For the purposes of the above-mentioned provision, the Court must determine whether a fair balance was struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 68, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

  IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 1471/05

  The Court not only finds this situation regrettable but considers that it also impairs the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, and Burdov, cited above, § 35).

• EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 67412/14

  BRITANISKINA v. LITHUANIA

  For the purposes of the above-mentioned provision, the Court must determine whether a fair balance was struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52, and Nekvedavicius v. Lithuania, no. 1471/05, § 86, 10 December 2013).