Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,41388) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YAKIS v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 33368/96
- EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96
- EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 33368/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
DE JONG, BALJET ET VAN DEN BRINK c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96
The Court notes that the only remedies which Article 35 § 1 of the Convention requires to be exhausted are those that relate to the breaches alleged; the existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; and it falls to the respondent State, if it pleads non-exhaustion, to establish that these conditions are satisfied (see, amongst many authorities, the De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, § 39). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 33368/96
The admissibility of evidence is primarily a matter for regulation by national law and, as a rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them (see the Kostovski v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 19, § 39).