Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KIRIL IVANOV v. BULGARIA
Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-c - Continued examination not justified);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
IVANOV v. BULGARIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
- EGMR, 23.10.2019 - 17599/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (21)
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.He can therefore claim to be a victim with respect to the decision to ban the rally, and his complaint is compatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, Commission decision of 29 June 1998, unreported, and Patyi and Others v. Hungary, no. 5529/05, § 25, 7 October 2008).
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos.He can therefore claim to be a victim with respect to the decision to ban the rally, and his complaint is compatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, Commission decision of 29 June 1998, unreported, and Patyi and Others v. Hungary, no. 5529/05, § 25, 7 October 2008).
- EGMR, 06.02.1981 - 6289/73
AIREY c. IRLANDE (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
A representative's fees are actually incurred if the applicant has paid them or is liable to pay them (see Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany (Article 50), 10 March 1980, § 15, Series A no. 36; Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 40, Series A no. 37; and Airey v. Ireland (Article 50), 6 February 1981, § 13, Series A no. 41), even if that liability is under a conditional-fee agreement, so long as that agreement is enforceable in the respective jurisdiction (see Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, § 89, 21 April 2016).
- EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
A representative's fees are actually incurred if the applicant has paid them or is liable to pay them (see Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany (Article 50), 10 March 1980, § 15, Series A no. 36; Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 40, Series A no. 37; and Airey v. Ireland (Article 50), 6 February 1981, § 13, Series A no. 41), even if that liability is under a conditional-fee agreement, so long as that agreement is enforceable in the respective jurisdiction (see Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, § 89, 21 April 2016). - EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 44079/98
THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria, no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59489/00, 20 October 2005; Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 46336/99, 24 November 2005; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 59491/00, 19 January 2006; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 37586/04, 18 October 2011; United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 34960/04, 18 October 2011; Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284/07, 18 October 2011; and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos. - EGMR, 04.10.2006 - 76642/01
ASSOCIATION SOS ATTENTATS ET DE BOERY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
Although those reasons must invariably reside in the particular circumstances of the case, they can be quite diverse (see Association SOS Attentats and de Boery v. France [GC] (dec.), no. 76642/01, § 37, ECHR 2006-XIV). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
In general, the Court examines complaints under Article 14 in addition to those under the substantive Article in conjunction with which it is being relied on only if a clear inequality of treatment in the enjoyment of the right in question is a fundamental aspect of the case and a separate examination is necessary (see, among other authorities, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 30, Series A no. 32; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 67, Series A no. 45; X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 32, Series A no. 91; Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 89, ECHR 1999-III; Aziz v. Cyprus, no. 69949/01, § 35, ECHR 2004-V; Timishev v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
In general, the Court examines complaints under Article 14 in addition to those under the substantive Article in conjunction with which it is being relied on only if a clear inequality of treatment in the enjoyment of the right in question is a fundamental aspect of the case and a separate examination is necessary (see, among other authorities, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 30, Series A no. 32; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 67, Series A no. 45; X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 32, Series A no. 91; Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 89, ECHR 1999-III; Aziz v. Cyprus, no. 69949/01, § 35, ECHR 2004-V; Timishev v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 55762/00
TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 41561/07
THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN - PIRIN AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2018 - 17599/07
41561/07 and 20972/08, 18 October 2011. - EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 35151/05
BEKIR-OUSTA ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 48284/07
SINGARTIYSKI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 34144/05
EMIN ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01
BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 26698/05
TOURKIKI ENOSI XANTHIS ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 16363/07
DZIDZAVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 5529/05
PATYI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 46336/99
IVANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 69949/01
AZIZ c. CHYPRE
- EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 19356/07
SHIOSHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA