Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 30287/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,39319) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HAMMERN v. NORWAY
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.09.2001 - 30287/96
- EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 30287/96
- EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 30287/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87
SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 30287/96
The Appeals Selection Committee further recalled that in the above case the Supreme Court considered the relationship between the conditions for compensation under Article 444 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, in particular the Sekanina v. Austria judgment of 25 August 1993 (Series A no. 266-A).In this respect the facts of his case could not be distinguished from those at issue in the Sekanina v. Austria judgment of 25 August 1993 (Series A no. 266-A) and the Asan Rushiti v. Austria judgment (no. 28389/95, 21.3.2000).
- EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 30287/96
Moreover, the scope of Article 6 § 2 is not limited to criminal proceedings that are pending (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, p.16, § 35). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79
Minelli ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 30287/96
In certain instances, the Court has also found the provision applicable to judicial decisions taken after the discontinuation of such proceedings (see in particular the following judgments: Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, and Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123), or following an acquittal (see Sekanina and Rushiti cited above and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001).