Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SABIROV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-3-c (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 24.05.1991 - 12744/87

  QUARANTA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 13465/04

  It thus leaves to the Contracting States the choice of the means of ensuring that it is secured in their judicial systems, the Court's task being only to ascertain whether the method they have chosen is consistent with the requirements of a fair trial (see Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, § 30, Series A no. 205).
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 13465/04

  The competent national authorities are required under Article 6 § 3 (c) to intervene only if a failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation is manifest or sufficiently brought to their attention in some other way (see Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, § 65, and Daud v. Portugal, 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, § 38).

• EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04

  SHEKHOV v. RUSSIA

  The above-mentioned shortcomings on the part of the court-appointed lawyer were manifest, which put the onus on the domestic authorities to intervene (see, for similar reasoning, Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 51, ECHR 2006-VI; Sabirov v. Russia, no. 13465/04, §§ 45 and 46, 11 February 2010; and Siyrak v. Russia, no. 38094/05, §§ 29-33, 19 December 2013).