Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17656/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64870) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALAGIC v. CROATIA
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17656/07
- EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 17656/07
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17656/07
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17656/07
The Court observes at the outset that the applicant availed himself of an effective domestic remedy in respect of the length of the proceedings - a constitutional complaint (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII) - and that the Constitutional Court found a violation of his right to a hearing within reasonable time but failed to award him appropriate compensation. - EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 29182/03
KOZLICA v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17656/07
If the Constitutional Court's decisions were not consistent with Convention principles, the Court held that the applicants were not required to lodge further constitutional complaints, as that would overstretch their duties under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, §§ 23 and 28, 2 November 2006).
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 28018/10
ZGLAVNIK v. CROATIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Oreb v. Croatia, no. 9951/06, 23 October 2008; and Alagic v. Croatia, no. 17656/07, 11 February 2010).