Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11, 69252/11, 69335/11   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2016,1344
EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11, 69252/11, 69335/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,1344)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11.02.2016 - 69234/11, 69252/11, 69335/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,1344)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11. Februar 2016 - 69234/11, 69252/11, 69335/11 (https://dejure.org/2016,1344)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,1344) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IBRAHIMOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Adequate time;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (14)  

  • EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 35289/11

    REGNER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    This Court has understood the proper administration of justice to require that judgments of courts and tribunals should adequately state the reasons on which they are based (see Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, § 103, 11 February 2016, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13

    MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA

    On the other hand, if there is some manifest irregularity which, seen in context, shows that a deprivation of liberty was chiefly meant for an ulterior purpose - the applicants are detained on vague or fabricated charges to prevent or punish their participation in rallies (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, §§ 52-57, 21 June 2011; Hakobyan and Others v. Armenia, no. 34320/04, § 123, 10 April 2012; Nemtsov, cited above, § 103; Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 107-08, 15 October 2015; Kasparov, cited above, §§ 50-56; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, §§ 146-47, 11 February 2016; and Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 126-27, 11 February 2016); or the authorities manipulate procedures to prolong the detention for the same purpose (see Navalnyy and Yashin, cited above, §§ 92-95), or to delay having to obtain judicial authorisation for the detention, as required under domestic law (see Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, §§ 86-88, 24 June 2010), or to proceed with a disguised extradition (see Bozano v. France, cited above, §§ 59-60; Nowak v. Ukraine, no. 60846/10, § 58, 31 March 2011; Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, §§ 163 and 165, 18 April 2013; and Eshonkulov v. Russia, no. 68900/13, § 65, 15 January 2015); or the applicant is illegally abducted and surrendered to another State (see Iskandarov v. Russia, no. 17185/05, §§ 109-15 and 148-51, 23 September 2010); or the citizens of another State are indiscriminately arrested with a view to being deported en masse as a measure of reprisal (see Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, §§ 185-86, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) - the Court finds an absence of a legitimate ground for the deprivation of liberty and accordingly a breach of Article 5 § 1.
  • EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 20589/13

    MEHTIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    In those circumstances, the Court is ready to accept that the dispersal of the demonstrations on 12 January, 26 January and 10 March 2013 was lawful (compare Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-75, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 24508/11

    MAHAMMAD MAJIDLI v. AZERBAIJAN

    In such circumstances, the Court is ready to accept that the dispersal of the demonstration of 10 March 2013 was lawful (compare Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-75, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 69397/11

    ABBAS AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    For a summary of the other relevant provisions concerning administrative proceedings, the relevant provisions concerning freedom of assembly, the organisation and holding of public assemblies, and the relevant extracts from international documents and press releases, see the judgment in the case of Huseynli and Others (cited above, §§ 56-77) and the judgment in the case of Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan (nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 44-59, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 19150/13

    BAYRAMOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    In such circumstances the Court is ready to accept that the dispersal of the demonstrations of 12 and 26 January 2013 was lawful (compare Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-75, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 65910/14

    KHALILOVA AND AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN

    In such circumstances, the Court has doubts as to whether the dispersal of the assembly of 6 May 2014 was prescribed by law (contrast with Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-75, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 43137/13

    BABAK HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    In such circumstances the Court is ready to accept that the dispersal of the demonstration of 10 March 2013 was lawful (compare Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-75, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 34262/14

    HUSEYNOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    Similar facts and complaints have already been examined in the Huseynli and Others judgment (cited above) in which the Court found a violation of Article 6 § 3 taken together with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Huseynli and Others, cited above, §§ 110-35; see also Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 74-96, 15 October 2015; and Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, § 93-115, 11 February 2016).
  • EGMR - 72316/17 (anhängig)

    VOLKOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

    Was there an "interference" by a public authority with Mr Volkov's right to freedom of expression, namely his freedom to impart information and ideas (compare Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 70-73, 11 February 2016)? In particular, was it ascertained in the domestic proceedings that the police intervention had had an actual and sufficient factual basis on account of a risk of explosion or fire; that a specific order given to the applicant (and that he had failed to comply with) was lawful under Russian law? Did the police act in compliance with the relevant procedures such as applicable for the evacuation in circumstances relating to bomb alerts or fire alarms?.
  • EGMR, 29.06.2017 - 44699/13

    HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 42989/13

    JAMIL HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 5417/13

    ABBASLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 72230/11

    BAYRAMLI v. AZERBAIJAN

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht