|EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 17828/05|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OCHELKOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
- EGMR, 26.03.2015 - 40166/07
Russland muss Tschetschenen Schmerzensgeld zahlenTo assess this evidence, the Court has adopted the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt", but has added that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV, and Ochelkov v. Russia, no. 17828/05, § 83, 11 April 2013).
- EGMR - 32901/15 (anhängig)
SHINDYASOV v. RUSSIADid the authorities carry out an effective official investigation into the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment in police custody as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV, and Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 125-40, 24 July 2014)? In particular, was the forensic medical examination of the applicant carried out on 3 December 2013 in compliance with the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment's (CPT) standards, which are regularly taken into account by the Court in its examination of cases concerning ill-treatment (see Özgür Uyanik v. Turkey, no. 11068/04, § 36, 23 March 2010; Barabanshchikov v. Russia, no. 36220/02, §§ 48, 59, 8 January 2009; and Ochelkov v. Russia, no. 17828/05, § 103, 11 April 2013).
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.