Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RID NOVAYA GAZETA AND ZAO NOVAYA GAZETA v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  Judicial review 38. For a summary of the applicable legislative provisions and judicial practice in relation to judicial review under Chapter 25 of the Russian Code of Civil Procedure ("the CCP"), see Roman Zakharov v. Russia ([GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 92-100, ECHR 2015), and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia (nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 276-88, 7 February 2017).

  The deficiencies identified above were not remedied on judicial review (see Karastelev and Others, cited above, §§ 94-97; compare Ivashchenko, cited above, § 88; Polyakova and Others v. Russia, nos. 35090/09 and 3 others, §§ 110-14, 7 March 2017; Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 356, 7 February 2017; and Ustinova v. Russia, no. 7994/14, §§ 51-52, 8 November 2016, concerning the same type of judicial review procedure under Russian law).

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  The Court reiterates that there is a possibility under Article 41 of the Convention that a commercial company may be awarded monetary compensation for non-pecuniary damage (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV; see also Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, §§ 140-41, 21 February 2017, and OOO Regnum v. Russia, no. 22649/08, § 91, 8 September 2020).
• EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 22649/08

  OOO REGNUM v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  The Court reiterates that there is a possibility under Article 41 of the Convention that a commercial company may be awarded monetary compensation for non-pecuniary damage (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV; see also Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, §§ 140-41, 21 February 2017, and OOO Regnum v. Russia, no. 22649/08, § 91, 8 September 2020).

 
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  Furthermore, even in the absence of any actual penalty or the like, an individual may nevertheless argue that a law breaches his or her rights in the absence of a specific instance of enforcement, and thus claim to be a "victim", within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, if he or she is required either to modify his or her conduct or risk being prosecuted, or if he or she is a member of a category of persons who risk being directly affected by the legislation (see S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, §§ 57 and 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 45083/06

  NOVAYA GAZETA AND MILASHINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  This could include situations where a journalist does not act in good faith in accordance with the ethics of journalism and with the diligence expected in responsible journalism dealing with a matter of public interest (see Novaya Gazeta and Milashina v. Russia, no. 45083/06, § 72, 3 October 2017).
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 42911/08

  ORLOVSKAYA ISKRA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  The Court reiterates that there is a possibility under Article 41 of the Convention that a commercial company may be awarded monetary compensation for non-pecuniary damage (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV; see also Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, §§ 140-41, 21 February 2017, and OOO Regnum v. Russia, no. 22649/08, § 91, 8 September 2020).
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 15449/09

  MARGULEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  Article 34 concerns not just the direct victim or victims of an alleged violation, but also any indirect victim to whom the violation would cause harm or who would have a valid and personal interest in seeing it brought to an end (see Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 47, ECHR 2013 (extracts) and cases cited therein; compare Margulev v. Russia, no. 15449/09, §§ 36-38, 8 October 2019).
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  Judicial review 38. For a summary of the applicable legislative provisions and judicial practice in relation to judicial review under Chapter 25 of the Russian Code of Civil Procedure ("the CCP"), see Roman Zakharov v. Russia ([GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 92-100, ECHR 2015), and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia (nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 276-88, 7 February 2017).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  At the same time, it is reiterated that methods of reporting may vary considerably, depending on, among other things, the type of media in question (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298).
• EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 11257/16

  Regeln für Hyperlinks konkretisiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  The Court has considered that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person in an interview would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild, cited above, § 35, and, subsequently in the defamation context, Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 77, ECHR 2004-XI, and Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary, no. 11257/16, § 80, 4 December 2018).

• EGMR - 4374/18 (anhängig)

  GOGOLEV v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications

  10 (1) - restriction on freedom of expression for displaying a totalitarian symbol - the applicant was arrested and sentenced to a fine of RUB 1, 000 for displaying Nazi symbols (Art. 20.3 CAO, final decision on 13/09/2018 by the Supreme Court of the Tyva Republic) (RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, 11 May 2021, and Karatayev v. Russia [Committee], no. 56109/07, 13 July 2021).

  10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - on 10/11/2020 the applicant published a video on his personal YouTube channel which depicted banned symbols related to a banned organisation; he was sentenced to 10-day detention (Art. 20.3. § 1 CAO, final decision on 27/01/2021 by the Khabarovsk Regional Court) (cf. RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, 11 May 2021, and Karatayev v. Russia [Committee], no. 56109/07, 13 July 2021).

• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34241/16

  KHORRSHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 125-31 and 189-212, 26 April 2016, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, §§ 101-13, 11 May 2021 and Bodalev v. Russia, no. 67200/12, §§ 101-03, 6 September 2022, as to various interferences with the right to freedom of expression and the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for those interferences; Bodalev, cited above, §§ 75-95, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, §§ 100-42, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, §§ 53-75, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, §§ 84-97, 3 October 2013, as to disproportionate measures taken against organisers or participants of public assemblies.
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 5869/17

  ERKIZIA ALMANDOZ c. ESPAGNE

  [6] La terminologie de la « justification'est également utilisée dans deux autres arrêts récents de la troisième section de la Cour, non encore définitifs et pour cette raison non cités dans le présent arrêt: RID Novaya Gazeta et ZAO Novaya Gazeta c. Russie, no 44561/11, § 91, 11 mai 2021, et Kilin c. Russie, no 10271/12, § 71, 11 mai 2021.

 
• EGMR - 74186/17 (anhängig)

  ORLOVSKIY AND SANGORSKIY v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

  10 (1) - restriction on freedom of expression for displaying a totalitarian symbol - the applicant was sentenced to 3-day detention for having images with the swastika (such as a cartoon-type pony with that symbol) on his social-networking account (RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, 11 May 2021, and Karatayev v. Russia [Committee], no. 56109/07, 13 July 2021);.
• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 62239/12

  KAYMAK ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE

  Or, en l'espèce, elle relève que la sanction litigieuse, si minime qu'elle ait été et malgré sa dénomination « sans caractère punitif ", qui d'ailleurs est imprécise, était de nature à dissuader les requérants et les autres membres de syndicats d'exercer librement leur activité (voir, mutatis mutandis, Karaçay c. Turquie, no 6615/03, § 37, 27 mars 2007, Kaya et Seyhan c. Turquie, no 30946/04, § 30, 15 septembre 2009, ?ži?Ÿman et autres c. Turquie, no 1305/05, § 34, 27 septembre 2011, Doǧan Altun, précité, § 50; pour une approche similaire dans le contexte de l'article 10, RID Novaya Gazeta et ZAO Novaya Gazeta c. Russie, no 44561/11, § 62, 11 mai 2021).
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 61177/09

  KORKUT ET AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL TÜRKIYE c. TÜRKIYE

  Par ailleurs, la Cour ne doute pas que l'association requérante, bien qu'elle n'était pas partie à la procédure interne, avait un intérêt légitime à déposer devant la Cour un grief tiré de l'article 11 de la Convention (RID Novaya Gazeta et ZAO Novaya Gazeta c. Russie, no 44561/11, § 65, 11 mai 2021).
• EGMR - 50365/18 (anhängig)

  LOMAKIN v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications

  10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - the applicant sentenced to a fine of RUB 1, 000 for displaying Nazi symbols (Art. 20.3 CAO), final on 16/09/2021, Volgograd Regional Court (RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, 11 May 2021, and Karatayev v. Russia [Committee], no. 56109/07, 13 July 2021),.