Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BANNIKOV v. LATVIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 Buchst. b MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Bannikov v. Latvia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BANNIKOV v. LATVIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 19279/03
• EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03
• EGMR, 16.09.2015 - 19279/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  The Court has clarified its understanding of the "no significant disadvantage" criterion in Korolev v. Russia (dec.) (no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010), in the following terms:.

  It would be a sad day indeed for fundamental human rights if, in order to reduce its backlog, the Court were to begin applying Article 35 § 3 (b) to Article 5 § 1 situations, instead of confining the said ground of inadmissibility to violations with a financial or patrimonial impact considered to be trivial (as, for example, in Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, 1 July 2010; and Cecchetti v. San Marino (dec.), no. 40174/08, 9 April 2013).

• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 66820/01

  SVIPSTA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  A full description of the law and practice as concerns pre-trial detention at the relevant time may be found in Svipsta v. Latvia (no. 66820/01, §§ 53-66, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)) and Vogins v. Latvia (no. 3992/02, §§ 22-23, 1 February 2007).
• EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 3992/02

  VOGINS c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  A full description of the law and practice as concerns pre-trial detention at the relevant time may be found in Svipsta v. Latvia (no. 66820/01, §§ 53-66, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)) and Vogins v. Latvia (no. 3992/02, §§ 22-23, 1 February 2007).

 
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 16593/10

  ZWINKELS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  This means that the Court will examine whether: (1) the applicant has suffered a significant disadvantage; (2) whether respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols attached thereto requires an examination of the application on the merits; and (3) whether the case was duly considered by a domestic tribunal (see Zwinkels v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 16593/10, § 24, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see, mutatis mutandis, Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 100, Series A no. 161).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 19279/03

  46113/99 and others, § 98, ECHR 2010).