Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRIZZIA v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Prizzia v. Hungary

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PRIZZIA v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 20255/12

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the various interests involved, namely the interests of the child, the parents and other family members as well as the general interest in ensuring the respect for the rule of law; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see, for similar reasoning, Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290).
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31679/96

  IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 20255/12

  In a case of this kind, the adequacy of a measure is to be judged by the swiftness of its implementation, as the passage of time can have irremediable consequences for relations between the child and the parent who does not live with him or her (see Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 102, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 26.06.2003 - 48206/99

  MAIRE v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 20255/12

  However, even if the domestic legal order did not allow for the imposition of effective sanctions, each Contracting State must equip itself with an adequate and sufficient legal arsenal to ensure compliance with the positive obligations imposed on it by Article 8 of the Convention and the other international agreements it has chosen to ratify (see Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 76, ECHR 2003-VII).

• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 32407/13

  KACPER NOWAKOWSKI v. POLAND

  In relation to the State's obligation to take positive measures, the Court has held that in cases concerning the implementation of the contact rights of one of the parents, Article 8 includes a parent's right to the taking of measures with a view to his being reunited with his child and an obligation on the national authorities to facilitate such reunion, in so far as the interest of the child dictates that everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, if and when appropriate, to "rebuild" the family; the State's obligation is not one of result, but one of means (see, among other authorities, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I; Cristescu v. Romania, no. 13589/07, § 61, 10 January 2012; Prizzia v. Hungary, no. 20255/12, § 35, 11 June 2013; P.K. v. Poland, no. 43123/10, § 86, 10 June 2014).
• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 731/22

  B.K. AND B.B.K. v. BULGARIA

  The general principles concerning the implementation of contact rights of one of the parents have been summarised in Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I, Prizzia v. Hungary, no. 20255/12, §§ 35-38, 11 June 2013, and Vyshnyakov v. Ukraine, no. 25612/12, §§ 35-36, 24 July 2018.
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 72059/16

  PAVLOVI v. BULGARIA

  The general principles concerning the implementation of contact rights of one of the parents have been summarized in Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania (no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I), Prizzia v. Hungary (no. 20255/12, § 35, 11 June 2013), and Vyshnyakov v. Ukraine (no. 25612/12, §§ 35-36, 24 July 2018).

 
• EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 13240/15

  MÜLLER v. GERMANY

  Der Gerichtshof weist insoweit erneut auf seine gängige Herangehensweise im Zusammenhang mit Artikel 6 hin, wonach einem Beschwerdeführer nicht vorgeworfen werden kann, die nach dem innerstaatlichen Recht zur Verfügung stehenden Rechtsmittel voll auszuschöpfen, um seine Interessen zu verteidigen (siehe Prizzia./. Ungarn, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 20255/12, Rdnr. 43, 11. Juni 2013, und Skorobogatova./. Russland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33914/02, Rdnr. 47, 1. Dezember 2005), und er hält es für angemessen, dieser Herangehensweise auch unter den vorliegenden Umständen zu folgen.
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 57960/11

  VOROZHBA c. RUSSIE

  Cela dit, la Cour considère que, face au refus avéré et persistant d'un parent de remettre l'enfant à l'autre parent, les autorités sont tenues de prendre des mesures coercitives effectives et réalistes de nature à inciter le parent défaillant à exécuter le jugement (Hansen c. Turquie, no 36141/97, § 105, 23 septembre 2003, Zelenevy c. Russie, no 59913/11, § 76, 3 octobre 2013, et Prizzia c. Hongrie, no 20255/12, § 46, 11 juin 2013).
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 5504/20

  K.Y. v. RUSSIA

  It should have become obvious to the bailiffs that the financial sanctions imposed on the child's mother were inadequate to improve the situation at hand and overcome her lack of cooperation, and yet no recourse to other realistic coercive measures against her, of a type which were likely to lead to compliance, was considered by the domestic authorities (see paragraphs 13-15 and 18 above; see also Zelenevy v. Russia, no. 59913/11, § 76, 3 October 2013; Prizzia v. Hungary, no. 20255/12, § 46, 11 June 2013; and Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 105, 23 September 2003; and compare to Pakhomova v. Russia, no. 22935/11, §§ 88-90, 24 October 2013).