Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 49131/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,13926) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 49131/10
Otherwise, the presumption of the protection of Article 6 should exist (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-II; Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, §§ 32-34, 5 February 2009; and Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, §§ 120-122, 20 November 2012). - EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 58688/11
HARABIN v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 49131/10
Otherwise, the presumption of the protection of Article 6 should exist (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-II; Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, §§ 32-34, 5 February 2009; and Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, §§ 120-122, 20 November 2012). - EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95
Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 49131/10
This does not mean, however, that a person who has been appointed as a civil servant cannot complain of being dismissed if that dismissal violates one of his or her rights under the Convention (see Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 41, ECHR 1999-VII, with further references). - EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 49131/10
Article 6 § 1 of the Convention may be relied on by individuals who claim that interference with the exercise of one of their civil rights has taken place and is unlawful, and who complain that they have not had the opportunity to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1. It does not in itself guarantee any particular content for "civil rights and obligations" in the substantive law of the Contracting States, and the Court may not create by way of interpretation of Article 6 § 1 a substantive right which has no legal basis in the State concerned (see, for example, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 117 and 119, ECHR 2005-X).