Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  G.H.H. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 34 MRK
  Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 2 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 3 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 13 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  G.H.H. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 34 MRK
  Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
• juris (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 43258/98
• EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 43258/98

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 43258/98

  Moreover, the right to political asylum is not contained in either the Convention or its Protocols (see the Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, § 102).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 43258/98

  In these circumstances, Article 3 implies the obligation not to expel the person in question to that country (see the Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 35-36, §§ 90- 91; the Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, §§ 69-70; and the Vilvarajah and Others judgment cited above, p. 34, § 103).
• EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89

  CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 43258/98

  In these circumstances, Article 3 implies the obligation not to expel the person in question to that country (see the Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 35-36, §§ 90- 91; the Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, §§ 69-70; and the Vilvarajah and Others judgment cited above, p. 34, § 103).

• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 42502/06

  MUMINOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court is not called upon to review in abstracto the compatibility of the relevant law and practice with the Convention, but to determine whether there was a remedy compatible with Article 13 of the Convention available to grant the applicant appropriate relief as regards his substantive complaint (see, among other authorities, G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no. 43258/98, § 34, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 11230/07

  PANJEHEIGHALEHEI v. DENMARK

  The Court does not exclude that the general situation in Iran in 1999 was such that making an asylum claim abroad may have constituted a risk factor (see, inter alia, Jabari v. Turkey, no. 40035/98, § 41, ECHR 2000-VIII and G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no. 43258/98, §§ 37-38, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 51315/12

  K.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Consequently, the applicant can no longer claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no. 43258/98, § 28, ECHR 2000-VIII).