Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAADI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 5-1 Violation de l'art. 5-2 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAADI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-2 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 13229/03
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 13229/03
• EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 13229/03

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2007, 913

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 11613/85

  KOLOMPAR c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 13229/03

  In the case of Kolompar, it accepted that the applicant's detention was in principle justified under Article 5 § 1 (f) where an extradition request had been made and the applicant was no longer detained under Article 5 § 1(a) or (c) (Kolompar v. Belgium, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 235-C, § 36).
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 17621/91

  KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 13229/03

  "Where the "lawfulness" of detention is in issue, including the question whether "a procedure prescribed by law" has been followed, the Convention refers essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules of national law, but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see, among many other authorities, the Kemmache v. France (no. 3) judgment of 24 November 1994, Series A no. 296-C, pp.
• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 13229/03

  A violation was found where applicants who had been detained pending extradition were not given any information for the first four days" detention (Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 416, ECHR 2005-...).

• OLG Hamm, 21.01.2010 - 15 Wx 58/09

  Anforderungen an das Verfahren der Anrodnung von Abschiebungshaft; Übersetzung …

  An eine bestimmte Form ist diese Mitteilung nicht gebunden (…EGMR, Urt. v. 11.7.2006; 13229/03 = NVwZ 2007, 913).