Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GUROV v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96

  COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, ECHR 2000-VII and Zand v. Austria, application no. 7360/76, report of the Commission of 12 October 1978, DR 15, p. 70, the applicant argued that the organisation of the judiciary should be regulated by a law emanating from Parliament and that the organisation of the judiciary in a democratic society should not depend on the discretion of the executive.
• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00

  Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  The Court recalls that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III).
• EKMR, 16.05.1977 - 7360/76

  ZAND v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, ECHR 2000-VII and Zand v. Austria, application no. 7360/76, report of the Commission of 12 October 1978, DR 15, p. 70, the applicant argued that the organisation of the judiciary should be regulated by a law emanating from Parliament and that the organisation of the judiciary in a democratic society should not depend on the discretion of the executive.

 
• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  As has already been found in Strasbourg case-law, a fixed term of office of a relatively short duration is allowed in respect of special administrative tribunals or disciplinary tribunals (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, § 57, and Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, § 80).
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  Where, however, domestic law provides for a right of appeal, the appeal proceedings will be treated as an extension of the trial process and accordingly will be subject to Article 6 (Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, § 25).
• EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

  CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  As has already been found in Strasbourg case-law, a fixed term of office of a relatively short duration is allowed in respect of special administrative tribunals or disciplinary tribunals (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, § 57, and Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, § 80).

• EGMR, 09.01.2013 - 21722/11

  OLEKSANDR VOLKOV c. UKRAINE

  The practice of tacit extension of judges" terms of office for an indefinite period after the expiry of their statutory term of office until they were reappointed has been found to violate the principle of a "tribunal established by law" (see Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, §§ 37-39, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court reiterates that the object of the term "established by law" in Article 6 of the Convention is to ensure "that the judicial organisation in a democratic society does not depend on the discretion of the executive, but that it is regulated by law emanating from Parliament" (see Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 34, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  HENRYK URBAN AND RYSZARD URBAN v. POLAND

  The Court adopted a similar stance in cases against other Contracting Parties where the finding of a breach of Article 6 was related to the lack of independence or impartiality of the domestic courts (see, San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-IX, and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 43, 11 July 2006).

 
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 19334/03

  DMD GROUP, A.S., v. SLOVAKIA

  This includes, in particular, provisions concerning the independence of the members of a tribunal, the length of their term of office, impartiality and the existence of procedural safeguards (see, for example, Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII, and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 36, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 36661/07

  CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND

  In countries where the law is codified, organisation of the judicial system cannot be left to the discretion of the judicial authorities, although this does not mean that the courts do not have some latitude to interpret the relevant national legislation (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 98, ECHR 2000-VII; and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 34, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 27.09.2012 - 7398/07

  CHADZITASKOS AND FRANTA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  In this context the Court reiterates that the requirement that a tribunal be established by law is closely connected with other fundamental guarantees of a fair trial, including the independence and impartiality of the members of a tribunal (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII, and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 36, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 30323/02

  PANDJIKIDZE ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE

  Il s'agit notamment des dispositions relatives aux mandats, aux incompatibilités et à la récusation des magistrats (Gurov c. Moldova, no 36455/02, § 36, 11 juillet 2006).
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 8162/13

  BIAGIOLI v. SAN MARINO

  This includes, in particular, provisions concerning the independence of the members of a tribunal, the length of their term of office, impartiality and the existence of procedural safeguards (see, for example, Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII, and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 36, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 4313/04

  GORGUILADZE c. GEORGIE

  Il s'agit notamment des dispositions relatives aux mandats, aux incompatibilités et à la récusation des magistrats (Gurov c. Moldova, no 36455/02, § 36, 11 juillet 2006).
• EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 39279/05

  IWANCZUK v. POLAND

  In countries where the law is codified, organisation of the judicial system cannot be left to the discretion of the judicial authorities, although this does not mean that the courts do not have some latitude to interpret the relevant national legislation (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 98, ECHR 2000-VII; Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 34, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 31264/04

  WIECZOREK v. POLAND