Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALEKSANDR NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Aleksandr Novikov v. Russia

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law provisions governing detention pending investigation and trial, see the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 78-93, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, §§ 69-78, 11 October 2011.

  The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian authorities" failure to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the detention of applicants (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-111, 27 November 2012, with numerous further references, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 179-89, ECHR 2005-X).

• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

  McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  Thus, it should be established whether the other grounds given by the authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 44, ECHR 2006-X).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  The national authorities must establish the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 62-63, 10 March 2009).

 
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02

  ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law provisions governing detention pending investigation and trial, see the cases of Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 78-93, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, §§ 69-78, 11 October 2011.
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian authorities" failure to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the detention of applicants (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-111, 27 November 2012, with numerous further references, and Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 179-89, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

  W. c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  Nor did the prosecutor have regard to pertinent factors such as the advancement of the investigation or judicial proceedings and their resumption or any other specific indications justifying the fear that he might abuse his regained liberty by carrying out acts aimed, for instance, at the falsification or destruction of evidence (see W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 36, Series A no. 254-A).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2013 - 7087/04

  As to the risk of flight, the Court reiterates that this risk should be assessed with reference to various factors, especially those relating to the character of the person involved, his morals, his home, his occupation, his assets, his family ties and all kinds of links with the country in which he is being prosecuted (see Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, § 10, Series A no. 8).

• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 7427/06

  DIMOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court recalls that it has frequently found violations of Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases against Russia on account of inhuman and degrading conditions of applicants" pre-trial detention and an excessive length of criminal proceedings against them (see, among other authorities, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, Aleksandr Novikov v. Russia, no. 7087/04, 11 July 2013, Moskovets v. Russia, no. 14370/03, 23 April 2009 and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI).