Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KUZMARSKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KUZMARSKIENÄ- v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  At the same time, the remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Kudla, cited above, §§ 157-158, and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 80, ECHR 2007-II).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to have recourse to it (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 37, Series A no. 40; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; and Kane v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 33655/06, 13 September 2011).
• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to have recourse to it (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 37, Series A no. 40; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; and Kane v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 33655/06, 13 September 2011).

 
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  An applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail (Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98 and 3 others, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI, and Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281/13, § 94, 2 June 2016).
• EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 37235/97

  SOFRI et AUTRES contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  The Court further reiterates that the obligation under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention requires only that an applicant should have normal recourse to the remedies likely to be effective, adequate and accessible (see Sofri and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 37235/97, ECHR 2003-VIII, and Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 45, ECHR 2006-II).
• EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 33655/06

  KANE v. CYPRUS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to have recourse to it (see Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 37, Series A no. 40; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; and Kane v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 33655/06, 13 September 2011).
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 6281/13

  Verurteilte Gewalttäter: Regeln zur Sicherungsverwahrung bestätigt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 54467/12

  An applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail (Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98 and 3 others, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI, and Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281/13, § 94, 2 June 2016).