Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 34697/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,19439) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DOLGIKH v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DOLGIKH v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. ... 13, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 34697/04
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings under Article 3, Article 6 § 1 taken in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c), and Article 13 of the Convention (see paragraphs 50, 56 and 60 above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application, and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the other complaints mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).