Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 74947/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,70831) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TIMINSKIY v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96
Schießbefehl
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 74947/01
This requirement is satisfied where the individual can know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the courts" interpretation of it, what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable (see, among other authorities, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II, and Cantoni v. France, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, p. 1627, § 29). - EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88
FEY v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 74947/01
The Court reiterates that the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Fey v. Austria, judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 28). - EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88
KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 74947/01
The Court reiterates that Article 7 of the Convention embodies, in general terms, the principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) and prohibits in particular the retrospective application of the criminal law where it is to an accused's disadvantage (see Kokkinakis v. Greece, judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 22, § 52).