Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 38601/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,53355) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TUROWSKI v. POLAND
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TUROWSKI v. POLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
SARDINAS ALBO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 38601/12
However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Sejdovic v. Italy [CG], no. 56581/00, § 45, ECHR 2006-II; Sardinas Albo v. Italy (dec.), no. 56271/00, ECHR 2004-I; and Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 71). - EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 38601/12
States are dispensed from answering before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system and those who wish to rely on the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court as concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 520070/08, § 75, 12 October 2010; Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], no. 46113/99, § 69, ECHR 2010; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV).