Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,27697) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MINDEK v. CROATIA
Revision rejected (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 6169/13
- EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13
- EGMR, 23.10.2019 - 6169/13
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13
Under the Court's case-law developed in the context of Article 8 of the Convention, the term "home" in the English version of Article 8 is not to be interpreted narrowly (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 30, Series A no. 251-B). - EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80
GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13
In a number of cases the Court has held that a given dwelling constituted a "home" even though the applicants were not living there on a permanent basis (see, for example, Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, § 46, Series A no. 109; McKay-Kopecka v. Poland (dec.), no. 45320/99, 19 September 2006; and Trifunovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 34162/06, 6 November 2008). - EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02
KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 6169/13
This may occur, for example, when it is clear that an application is knowingly based on untrue facts with a view to deceiving the Court, or where it is deliberately grounded on a description of facts omitting events of central importance (see Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 89, 20 June 2002, and Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, ECHR 2006-V).