Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2001,29468
EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,29468)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11.10.2001 - 50841/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,29468)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 11. Oktober 2001 - 50841/99 (https://dejure.org/2001,29468)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,29468) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95

    ROTARU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99
    The Court recalls that "a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention" (Amuur v. France judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 35, ECHR 2000-V).
  • EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

    DALBAN v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99
    The Court recalls that "a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention" (Amuur v. France judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 35, ECHR 2000-V).
  • EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

    ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 50841/99
    Turning to the question whether the impugned measures were proportionate, the Court recalls that the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are also factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of an interference in relation to the aim pursued (see among other authorities, Öztürk v. Turkey [G.C.], no. 22479/93, § 70, ECHR 1999-VI).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

    Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny

    It is, in any event, for the Court to give a final ruling on the restriction's compatibility with the Convention and this is to be done by assessing the circumstances of a particular case (see Rufi Osmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X, and Galstyan, cited above, § 114).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05

    KUDREVICIUS ET AUTRES c. LITUANIE

    It is, in any event, for the Court to give a final ruling on the restriction's compatibility with the Convention and this is to be done by assessing the circumstances of a particular case (see Rufi Osmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X, and Galstyan, cited above, § 114).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

    LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    It is, in any event, for the Court to give a final ruling on the restriction's compatibility with the Convention and this is to be done by assessing the circumstances of a particular case (see Rufi Osmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X, and Galstyan, cited above, § 114).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht