Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,41087) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAHINI v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
- EGMR, 19.06.2003 - 63412/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
The Court has found in respect of a large number of applications against Italy raising similar issues that there were special circumstances justifying a departure from the general rule (see Brusco v. Italy, (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02
SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
The Court recalls that in the Slavicek case (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, 4 July 2002, ECHR - 2002...), it found that the above provision represented an effective domestic remedy in respect of alleged unreasonable length of proceedings. - EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
Subsequently, on 5 September 2002 in the Nogolica case, the Court found that there existed a number of elements militating in favour of an exception also in respect of the Croatian cases (see Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, 5 September 2002, ECHR - 2002...). - EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88
ZANDER v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
According to the principles laid down in the Court's case-law (see, amongst other authorities, the Zander v. Sweden judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-B, p. 38, § 22), the Court has first to ascertain whether there was a dispute ("contestation") over a "right" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law. - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
BAUMANN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2002 - 63412/00
This rule is however subject to exceptions which might be justified by the specific circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, 22 May 2001, § 47, unreported).