Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KHATAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Khatayev v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27306/95

  KISMIR v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  In such circumstances the Court is bound to conclude that the authorities failed to comply with the requirements of promptness, thoroughness and effectiveness (see Kismir v. Turkey, no. 27306/95, § 117, 31 May 2005; Angelova and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 55523/00, § 103, ECHR 2007-IX; and Vladimir Fedorov, cited above, § 70).
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04

  PREMININY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  Observing the suspects", witnesses" and victims" demeanour during questioning and assessing the probative value of their testimony forms a substantial part of the investigative process (see Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 109, 10 February 2011).
• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 22947/93

  AKKOC v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  The forensic doctor must enjoy formal and de facto independence, have been provided with specialised training and have a mandate which is broad in scope (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 55 and § 118, ECHR 2000-X).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  However, even in the absence of these, where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for or diminishing his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III, with further references).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 208, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

  KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  The Court reiterates in this respect that even if Article 3 does not entitle a detainee to be released "on compassionate grounds", it has always interpreted the requirement to secure the health and well-being of detainees, among other things, as an obligation on the part of the State to provide detainees with the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla, cited above, § 94; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95 and 100, ECHR 2002-VI; and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 20877/04

  TESTA v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 56994/09

  In addition, in a situation where the authorities met with occasional refusal to cooperate and resistance to the treatment on the applicant's part, they offered him psychological support and attention, providing clear and complete explanations about medical procedures, the desired outcome of the treatment and the negative side-effects of interrupting the treatment, irregular medication or fasting (contrast Gorodnichev, cited above, § 91; and see Testa v. Croatia, no. 20877/04, § 52, 12 July 2007, and Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 80, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts)) (see paragraphs 20 and 21 above).
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 19223/04

  VLADIMIR FEDOROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 43233/02

  MAKSIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 18785/13

  KOUTALIDIS c. GRÈCE

  À cet égard, elle examine tout d'abord si le malade a bénéficié d'une assistance médicale adéquate et si les soins médicaux dispensés étaient adaptés à sa situation particulière (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 7309/04

  VEFA SERDAR c. TURQUIE

  En la matière, la Cour exige tout d'abord l'existence d'un encadrement médical pertinent du malade et l'adéquation des soins médicaux prescrits à sa situation particulière (Liartis, précité, § 49, et Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).
• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 41513/12

  TSOKAS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

  A cet égard, elle examine tout d'abord si le malade a bénéficié d'une assistance médicale adéquate et si les soins médicaux dispensés étaient adaptés à sa situation particulière (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).

 
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 48106/13

  GOIA c. GRÈCE

  La Cour exige, tout d'abord, l'existence d'un encadrement médical pertinent du malade et l'adéquation des soins médicaux prescrits à sa situation particulière (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).
• EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 61744/11

  N.G. c. RUSSIE

  Il se réfère enfin aux arrêts Bordikov c. Russie (no 921/03, 8 octobre 2009), Pitalev c. Russie (no 34393/03, 30 juillet 2009), Alekhin c. Russie (no 10638/08, 30 juillet 2009), et Khatayev c. Russie (no 56994/09, 11 octobre 2011) où la Cour n'a pas trouvé de violation de l'article 3 de la Convention concernant les soins administrés aux détenus ou a rejeté des griefs similaires pour défaut manifeste de fondement.
• EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 29896/13

  LAVRENTIADIS c. GRÈCE

  En outre, lorsque l'état de santé l'exige, le suivi médical doit se faire à des intervalles régulières et comporter un traitement adapté, destiné à le guérir ou du moins empêcher la dégradation de cet état (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 85, 11 octobre 2011 ; Sakhvadze c. Russie, no 15492/09, § 83, 10 janvier 2012).
• EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 2613/13

  AKIMENKOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko, cited above, § 100; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005).
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 27025/13

  KARGAKIS c. GRÈCE

  La Cour exige, tout d'abord, l'existence d'un encadrement médical pertinent du malade et l'adéquation des soins médicaux prescrits à sa situation particulière (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 16906/10

  LIARTIS c. GRÈCE

  La Cour exige, tout d'abord, l'existence d'un encadrement médical pertinent du malade et l'adéquation des soins médicaux prescrits à sa situation particulière (Khatayev c. Russie, no 56994/09, § 84, 11 octobre 2011).
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 39070/08

  ATAYEV v. RUSSIA

  The Court insists that, in particular, authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Khatayev v. Russia, no. 56994/09, § 85, 11 October 2011; Yevgeniy Alekseyenko v. Russia, no. 41833/04, § 100, 27 January 2011; Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 84, 21 December 2010; Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 121, 7 November 2006), and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at adequately treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006; and Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 79, 4 October 2005).
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 45393/04

  TIMOFEJEVI v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 19327/13

  KAVKAZSKIY v. RUSSIA