Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GARRIDO HERRERO v. SPAIN

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GARRIDO HERRERO v. SPAIN

  Art. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 61019/19

  It therefore follows that Article 2 does not entail the right to have third parties prosecuted - or convicted - for a criminal offence (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 257, 30 March 2016).

  However, it clearly flows from the Court's case-law that Article 2 of the Convention does not entail the right to have third parties prosecuted - still less convicted - for a criminal offence (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 257, 30 March 2016).

• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 61019/19

  The only circumstance in which the Court may, as an exception to this rule, question the findings and conclusions in question is where the latter are flagrantly and manifestly arbitrary, in a manner which flies in the face of justice and common sense and gives rise in itself to a violation of the Convention (De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 170, 23 February 2017).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 61019/19

  Obviously, the duty of effective protection can only arise if in the specific case there was effective knowledge of the facts or the possibility of knowing them on the part of the authorities and their agents, who adopted measures aimed at reducing or minimising that risk, always with full respect for the rights and procedural guarantees of the person under investigation (judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, § 116, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII, and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009).".
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 61019/19

  The Court recalls that there is no right under Article 6 of the Convention to obtain prosecution and conviction of a third party (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004 I).

• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 42429/16

  MEMEDOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  The only circumstance in which the Court may, as an exception to this rule, question the findings and conclusions in question is where the latter are flagrantly and manifestly arbitrary, in a manner which flies in the face of justice and common sense and gives rise in itself to a violation of the Convention (see Garrido Herrero v. Spain, no. 61019/19, § 85, 11 October 2022, with further references).