Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,61124) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to that in the present application (see Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Ertürk v. Turkey, no. 15259/02, 12 April 2005). - EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 27561/02
SOLMAZ c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04
The Court refers to the principles adopted in the Solmaz v. Turkey judgment (no. 27561/02, § 36, ECHR 2007-...), where it was held that, if the applicant is in effect imprisoned throughout, the multiple, consecutive detention periods should be regarded as a whole and the six-month period should start running only from the end of the last period. - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04
In the instant case, the Court notes the lack of such reasoning in the domestic court's decisions to prolong the applicant's detention In the Court's view, although, in general, the expression "the state of the evidence" may be a relevant factor in the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, nevertheless in the present case it, alone, cannot justify the length of detention of which the applicant complains (see the following judgments: Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 43; Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Mansur v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-B, § 55). - EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04
In the instant case, the Court notes the lack of such reasoning in the domestic court's decisions to prolong the applicant's detention In the Court's view, although, in general, the expression "the state of the evidence" may be a relevant factor in the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, nevertheless in the present case it, alone, cannot justify the length of detention of which the applicant complains (see the following judgments: Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 43; Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A; Mansur v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-B, § 55).