Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TV VEST AS ET ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI c. NORVEGE [Extraits]

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 10 Satisfaction équitable rejetée (tardiveté) (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TV VEST AS AND ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. NORWAY (extracts)

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 Just satisfaction dismissed (out of time) (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• IRIS Merlin (Kurzinformation)

  TV Vest und Rogaland Pensjonistparti gegen Norwegen

Besprechungen u.ä.

• lehofer.at (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Gänzliches Verbot politischer Werbung im Fernsehen verstößt gegen Art 10 EMRK

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  TV Vest AS & Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway

  [26.06.2008]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 21132/05
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05
• EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 21132/05

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2010, 241

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  Rather, it should follow the general reasoning in its Murphy judgment and, in particular, its approach in Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (2 March 1987, Series A no. 113) and Bowman v. the United Kingdom (cited above, § 43) in relation to Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.

  "42. Free elections and freedom of expression, particularly freedom of political debate, together form the bedrock of any democratic system (see the Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 22, § 47, and the Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, §§ 41-42).

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  In sum, the Court's task in exercising its supervisory function is not to take the place of the national authorities but rather to review under Article 10, in the light of the case as a whole, the decisions they have taken pursuant to their power of appreciation (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 24699/94

  VgT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  As regards the issue of necessity under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention Mr Justice Oftedal Broch had particular regard to the Court's judgments in Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland (no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI) and Murphy v. Ireland (no. 44179/98, ECHR 2003-IX), concerning restrictions on political broadcasts relating respectively to animal protection and to the rearing of animals (on television) and to the promotion of religious gatherings (on the radio).

 
• EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 44179/98

  MURPHY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  As regards the issue of necessity under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention Mr Justice Oftedal Broch had particular regard to the Court's judgments in Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland (no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI) and Murphy v. Ireland (no. 44179/98, ECHR 2003-IX), concerning restrictions on political broadcasts relating respectively to animal protection and to the rearing of animals (on television) and to the promotion of religious gatherings (on the radio).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  The Court has acknowledged that account must be taken of the fact that the audio-visual media have a more immediate and powerful effect than the print media (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298, and Murphy, cited above, § 69).
• EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 15088/89

  JACUBOWSKI v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  Thus, as was also the case in VgT, the impugned advertisement obviously fell outside the commercial context of product marketing, an area in which States traditionally have enjoyed a wide margin of appreciation (see VgT, cited above, § 69; markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165, and Jacubowski v. Germany, 23 June 1994, § 26, Series A no. 291-A).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  Thus, as was also the case in VgT, the impugned advertisement obviously fell outside the commercial context of product marketing, an area in which States traditionally have enjoyed a wide margin of appreciation (see VgT, cited above, § 69; markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165, and Jacubowski v. Germany, 23 June 1994, § 26, Series A no. 291-A).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  The test of "necessity in a democratic society" requires the Court to determine whether the "interference" complained of corresponded to a "pressing social need", whether it was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and whether the reasons given by the national authorities to justify it are relevant and sufficient (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 62, Series A no. 30).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  In this connection, according to the Court's case-law there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate on questions of public interest (see Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 38 and 42, Series A no. 103; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-V; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 45, Reports 1998-I; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 46, ECHR 1999-VIII; Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken, cited above, § 66; and Murphy, cited above, § 67).
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21132/05

  In this connection, according to the Court's case-law there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate on questions of public interest (see Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 38 and 42, Series A no. 103; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-V; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 45, Reports 1998-I; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 46, ECHR 1999-VIII; Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken, cited above, § 66; and Murphy, cited above, § 67).

• BVerfG, 27.04.2021 - 2 BvR 206/14

  Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen eine im Verfahren der gegenseitigen Anerkennung …

  Bei der Ermittlung der Gewährleistungsgehalte nimmt der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte daher immer wieder sowohl auf nationale als auch auf unionale Grundrechte Bezug (vgl. EGMR , Bosphorus Airways v. Ireland, Urteil vom 30. Juni 2005, Nr. 45036/98, § 148; Zolothukin v. Russia, Urteil vom 10. Februar 2009, Nr. 14939/03, § 79; Scoppola v. Italy, Urteil vom 17. September 2009, Nr. 10249/03, § 105; Bayatyan v. Armenia, Urteil vom 7. Juli 2011, Nr. 23459/03, § 103 ff.; EGMR, TV Vest As u. Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, Urteil vom 11. Dezember 2008, Nr. 21132/05, §§ 24, 67;… vgl. auch Kraus, in: Dörr/Grote/Marauhn, EMRK/GG Konkordanzkommentar, 2. Aufl. 2013, Kap. 3 Rn. 24;… Richter, in: Dörr/Grote/Marauhn, EMRK/GG Konkordanzkommentar, 2. Aufl. 2013, Kap. 9 Rn. 3, 74;… Meyer-Ladewig/Nettesheim/v. Raumer, EMRK, 4. Aufl. 2017, Einleitung, Rn. 22).
• EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08

  Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung

  The Court accepts that this corresponds to the legitimate aim of protecting the "rights of others" to which the second paragraph of Article 10 refers (VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, § 62, ECHR 2001-VI; and TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, § 78, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).

  Secondly, as in the VgT and TV Vest cases (VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001 VI; and TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, 11 December 2008), the interference with the applicant's freedom of expression stemmed not from a decision or exercise of discretion of a court or executive authority but from a statutory prohibition applicable to all forms of political advertising.

  It follows, as the judgment points out (paragraph 109), that the more convincing the general justifications for the general measure are, the less importance the Court will attach to its impact in the particular case under examination (see, for example, Murphy, cited above, and TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 3840/10

  Türkei: Verbot von Kurden-Partei DTP war rechtswidrig

  Dès lors que la Cour applique une marge d'appréciation stricte pour un discours « d'intérêt général ", l'interprétation doit être encore plus stricte pour un discours politique émanant d'un parti politique (voir, mutatis mutandis, TV Vest AS et Rogaland Pensjonistparti c. Norvège, no 21132/05, § 36, CEDH 2008).

 
• EGMR, 13.07.2012 - 16354/06

  MOUVEMENT RAËLIEN SUISSE c. SUISSE

  Arguably, even in the case of the "most protected" speech, namely that of a political nature, a somewhat wider margin of appreciation than that normally accorded is applicable to advertisements (see TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, § 67, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 22.11.2012 - 39315/06

  TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 88, ECHR 2004-XI; Voskuil, cited above, § 63; and TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, § 58, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 20002/13

  ASSOCIAZIONE POLITICA NAZIONALE LISTA MARCO PANNELLA ET RADICALI ITALIANI c. …

  Sur le fond 68. La Cour rappelle s'être penchée auparavant sur des affaires portant sur une interdiction d'accès aux émissions télévisées touchant un parti politique (VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken c. Suisse, no 24699/94, CEDH 2001-VI et TV Vest AS et Rogaland Pensjonistparti c. Norvège, no 21132/05, CEDH 2008 (extraits)) ou sur une interdiction de diffusion d'annonces publicitaires de nature politique (Animal Defenders International c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 48876/08, § 78, CEDH 2013 (extraits)).