Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 15991/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55168) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NIKOLSKI v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 15991/08
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial and enforcement proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland, no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland, no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and in its the judgment in the case of Krzysztofiak v. Poland, no. 38018/07, §§ 23-31, 20 April 2010. - EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 38018/07
KRZYSZTOFIAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 15991/08
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial and enforcement proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland, no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland, no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and in its the judgment in the case of Krzysztofiak v. Poland, no. 38018/07, §§ 23-31, 20 April 2010. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 15991/08
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 15991/08
The Court first observes that the applicability of Article 6 of the Convention in the instant case is open to doubt, as it is not clear whether the proceedings concerned the determination of a "criminal charge" against the applicant (see Subinski v. Slovenia, no. 19611/04, § 62, 18 January 2007; and Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51).