Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IRAKLI MINDADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  The relevant authorities were thereby sufficiently informed of the applicant's situation and had an opportunity to offer redress (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 70, 28 March 2006; Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 74, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  The authorities must also ensure that a comprehensive record is kept concerning the detainee's state of health and his treatment while in detention (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)); that the diagnoses and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov, cited above, § 115, and Melnik, cited above, §§ 104-106); and that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a therapeutic strategy aimed, to the extent possible, at curing the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Isayev v. Ukraine, no. 28827/02, § 58, 28 May 2009; and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

  KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  The authorities must also ensure that a comprehensive record is kept concerning the detainee's state of health and his treatment while in detention (see, for example, Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)); that the diagnoses and care are prompt and accurate (see Hummatov, cited above, § 115, and Melnik, cited above, §§ 104-106); and that where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic and involves a therapeutic strategy aimed, to the extent possible, at curing the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see Hummatov, cited above, §§ 109 and 114; Isayev v. Ukraine, no. 28827/02, § 58, 28 May 2009; and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006).

 
• EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 30649/05

  HOLOMIOV v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  The authorities must also show that the necessary conditions were created for the prescribed treatment to be actually followed through (see Hummatov, cited above, § 116, and Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 117, 7 November 2006).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 9852/03

  HUMMATOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  9852/03 and 13413/04, § 92, 29 November 2007).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 28300/06

  SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  The relevant authorities were thereby sufficiently informed of the applicant's situation and had an opportunity to offer redress (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 70, 28 March 2006; Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 74, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); and Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 17012/09

  Article 35 § 1 further requires that any procedural means that might prevent a breach of the Convention should have been used (see Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200).

• EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 13185/07

  ROSTOMASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012); and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).
• EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 37747/08

  KITIASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons have been summarised by the Court in the case of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein; see also Goginashvili, cited above, §§ 69-70; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012; and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia, no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012).
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18720/08

  BADUASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili v. Georgia (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012); and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).

 
• EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 26657/07

  MIRZASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Jeladze (cited above, §§ 41-42); and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012).
• EGMR, 20.12.2018 - 51772/08

  KIKALISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons have been summarised by the Court in the case of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein; see also Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, §§ 69-70, 4 October 2011; Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012; and Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia, no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012).
• EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 55506/08

  MESKHIDZE v. GEORGIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, ECHR 2016, with further references therein); see also Goginashvili (cited above, §§ 69-70); Irakli Mindadze v. Georgia (no. 17012/09, §§ 39-40, 11 December 2012, and Jeladze v. Georgia (no. 1871/08, §§ 41-42, 18 December 2012).