Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GASSNER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court Reasonable time) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GASSNER v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court Reasonable time)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06

  The Court reiterates its finding in the case of Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no.63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV that in order for the respondent State to be able to rely before the Court on the applicant's status as a civil servant excluding him from the protection embodied in Article 6, two conditions must be fulfilled.
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06

  It was from that moment that a "dispute" arose within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27, and Morscher v. Austria, no. 54039/00, § 38, 5 February 2004; Bachmayer v. Austria, no 36650/05, § 35, 28 October 2010).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06

  As regards the Government's further argument that the applicant should have lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court about the length of the proceedings, the Court has consistently held that domestic remedies must be exhausted only if they are shown to be effective, sufficient and accessible (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 38314/06

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 36871/11

  GH IMMOBILIENMAKLER GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Having regard to the above considerations and its case-law on the subject (see, mutatis mutandis, Birnleitner v. Austria (No. 2), no. 22601/09, § 17, 13 November 2014, and Gassner v. Austria, no. 38314/06, § 38, 11 December 2012), the Court is satisfied that in the particular circumstances of the case the reasonable time requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention has been complied with.