Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55165) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SABO v. SERBIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98
KARNER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06
However, in cases where no heirs or close relatives expressed the wish to pursue the application, it has been the Court's practice to strike the applications out of the list of cases (see, among other authorities, Scherer v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287, pp. 14-15, § 31: Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), unless special circumstances, as defined in Article 37 § 1 in fine, existed that required the examination of the application (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX).Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the examination of the case to be continued (contrast Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, §§ 24-28, ECHR 2003-IX).
- EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2476/02
THÉVENON c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06
However, in cases where no heirs or close relatives expressed the wish to pursue the application, it has been the Court's practice to strike the applications out of the list of cases (see, among other authorities, Scherer v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287, pp. 14-15, § 31: Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), unless special circumstances, as defined in Article 37 § 1 in fine, existed that required the examination of the application (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 03.10.2008 - 44574/98
Kovacic u. a. ./. Slowenien
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06
44574/98, 45133/98 and 48316/99, § 178, 6 November 2006). - EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90
SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06
However, in cases where no heirs or close relatives expressed the wish to pursue the application, it has been the Court's practice to strike the applications out of the list of cases (see, among other authorities, Scherer v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287, pp. 14-15, § 31: Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 2006-III), unless special circumstances, as defined in Article 37 § 1 in fine, existed that required the examination of the application (see Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44103/06
The Court notes that in a number of cases in which the applicant died while the application was pending before the Court it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or close family members expressing the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, among other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35; Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Kovacic and Others v. Slovenia, nos.