Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BIRYUCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) Violation of Article 5 - ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 1253/04

  Regard being had to the absence of any heirs who wish to pursue the application on behalf of this applicant or any reasons which would require a continuation of the examination of the case (see, by way of contrast, Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 28, ECHR 2003-IX), the Court, in so far as his complaints are concerned, strikes the application out of its list, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention.
• EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04

  MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 1253/04

  Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court does not see any reason to hold otherwise (see Matijasevic v. Serbia, no. 23037/04, §§ 47-51, ECHR 2006-X).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 4815/18

  KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 52342/20

  LAVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in application no. 24881/21 will constitute in itself sufficient just satisfaction (see Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 44363/14 and 2 others, § 12, 4 June 2020, and Puzanov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 26895/14 and 2 other applications, § 13, 15 September 2022).
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 20948/13

  MEZAK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

 
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 34241/16

  KHORRSHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 2954/18

  MAZANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 83654/17

  SAVELYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 17. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 07.12.2023 - 3345/18

  OVCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 40408/18

  GORYUNKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 38503/18

  MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 26627/05

  KARIMBAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Biryuchenko and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 1253/04 and 2 others, § 96, 11 December 2014) and to the amount of the award offered by the Government under the unilateral declaration, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 42282/06

  MARKELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 76201/17

  KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA