Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,52863) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOPALOGLU v. GEORGIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TOPALOGLU v. GEORGIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 46632/13
Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08
Thus, in the current case, no issue arose as to whether the principle of res judicata applied to facts admitted in a case to which the applicant was not a party (contrast Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632/13 and 28671/14, §§ 104-109, 23 February 2016). - EGMR, 05.07.2001 - 38321/97
Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08
However, this fact in and of itself could not have had a prejudicial effect on the proceedings conducted against the applicant (see Erdem v. Germany (dec.), no. 38321/97, 9 December 1999). - EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02
VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08
They testify without being under oath, that is, without any affirmation of the truth of their statements which could render them punishable for perjury for wilfully making untrue statements (see Melnikov v. Russia, no. 23610/03, § 75, 14 January 2010, and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, § 102, 24 July 2008). - EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08
Firstly, as regards plea bargaining in general, the Court has previously found it to be a common feature of European criminal justice systems (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 135, 17 September 2009, and Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2014 (extracts), with further references). - EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 23610/03
MELNIKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 25406/08
They testify without being under oath, that is, without any affirmation of the truth of their statements which could render them punishable for perjury for wilfully making untrue statements (see Melnikov v. Russia, no. 23610/03, § 75, 14 January 2010, and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, § 102, 24 July 2008).