Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 41178/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,45039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RAL v. POLAND
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
RAL v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98
GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 41178/12
By way of contrast, the hope of recognition of a property right which it has been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, nor can a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 82-83, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97
THLIMMENOS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 41178/12
Thus, the circumstances complained of did not amount to a situation in which a State, without an objective and reasonable justification, failed to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different (the Government cited in this context Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV and Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 288, ECHR 2012).