Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,63402
EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02 (https://dejure.org/2010,63402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.01.2010 - 33539/02 (https://dejure.org/2010,63402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Januar 2010 - 33539/02 (https://dejure.org/2010,63402)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63402) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 41373/04

    ARCINSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to proceedings with legal aid when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 21, ECHR 2002-II; Staroszczyk v. Poland, cited above, § 130, Sialkowska v. Poland, cited above, § 107, Smyk v. Poland, no. 8958/04, § 4, 28 July 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, § 34, 15 September 2009 and R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001, mutatis mutandis).

    [1]Kulikowski v. Poland, no18353/03, 18 August 2009, Antonicelli v. Poland, no2815/05, 18 August 2009, Arciÿski v. Poland, 41373/04, 15 September 2009 and Zapadka v. Poland, n°2615/05, 15 December 2009).

  • EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 8958/04

    SMYK v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to proceedings with legal aid when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 21, ECHR 2002-II; Staroszczyk v. Poland, cited above, § 130, Sialkowska v. Poland, cited above, § 107, Smyk v. Poland, no. 8958/04, § 4, 28 July 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, § 34, 15 September 2009 and R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001, mutatis mutandis).

    I have elaborated on this in my dissenting opinions in Kulikowski v. Poland, 8958/04, 19 May 2009, and Smyk v. Poland, 18353/03, 28 July 2009.

  • EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46800/99

    DEL SOL c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to proceedings with legal aid when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 21, ECHR 2002-II; Staroszczyk v. Poland, cited above, § 130, Sialkowska v. Poland, cited above, § 107, Smyk v. Poland, no. 8958/04, § 4, 28 July 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, § 34, 15 September 2009 and R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001, mutatis mutandis).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 35237/97

    ADOUD ET BOSONI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    Given the special nature of the court of cassation's role, which is limited to reviewing whether the law has been correctly applied, the Court is able to accept that the procedure followed in such courts may be more formal (see Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII).
  • EGMR, 18.12.2001 - 29692/96

    R.D. v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to proceedings with legal aid when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 21, ECHR 2002-II; Staroszczyk v. Poland, cited above, § 130, Sialkowska v. Poland, cited above, § 107, Smyk v. Poland, no. 8958/04, § 4, 28 July 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, § 34, 15 September 2009 and R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001, mutatis mutandis).
  • EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

    POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    However, where such courts do exist, the guarantees of Article 6 must be complied with, for instance in that it guarantees to litigants an effective right of access to the courts for the determination of their "civil rights and obligations" (see, among many other authorities, Levages Prestations Services v. France, 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1544-45, § 44, and Poitrimol v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A, § 13-15).
  • EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80

    GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    A requirement that an appellant be represented by a qualified lawyer before the court of cassation, such as in the present case, cannot in itself be seen as contrary to Article 6. This requirement is clearly compatible with the characteristics of the Supreme Court as a highest court examining appeals on points of law and it is a common feature of the legal systems in several member States of the Council of Europe (see Gillow v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, § 69; Vacher v. France, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, pp. 2148-49, §§ 24 and 28; Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, § 42, 27 June 2006; Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, § 129, 22 March 2007; Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, § 106, 22 March 2007).
  • EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

    PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
    Having regard to the delay with which the applicant availed herself of her procedural right, the Court is of the view that she failed to display diligence which should normally be expected from a party to civil proceedings (see Pretto and Others v. Italy, judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, pp. 14-15, § 33 ).
  • EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34736/06

    ZEBROWSKI v. POLAND

    Provisions of civil law and the case-law of the domestic courts concerning cassation appeals have been extensively summarised in the judgments in the cases of Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, 22 March 2007; Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, 22 March 2007; and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010.

    Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009, Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009, Zapadka v. Poland, no. 2619/05, 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland, no. 648/02, 6 July 2010, Subicka v. Poland, no. 29342/06, 14 September 2010, Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010, Slowik v. Poland, no. 31477/05, 12 April 2011, Subicka v. Poland (n° 2) nos.

  • EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 6865/19

    FEILAZOO v. MALTA

    Domestic legal aid representation 125. The Court observes that according to its case-law under Article 6 in discharging the obligation to provide parties to civil proceedings with legal aid, when it is provided by domestic law, the State must display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see, inter alia, Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, § 129, 22 March 2007; Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, § 107, 22 March 2007; and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, § 46, 12 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 29342/06

    SUBICKA v. POLAND

    Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009; Zapadka v. Poland, no. 2619/05, 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland, no. 648/02, 6 July 2010 and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010.
  • EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 5968/09

    ANGHEL v. ITALY

    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to civil proceedings with legal aid, when it is provided by domestic law, the State must display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see, inter alia, Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, § 129, 22 March 2007; Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, § 107, 22 March 2007; and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, § 46, 12 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 9566/10

    DOMBROWSKI v. POLAND

    Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009, Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009, Zapadka v. Poland, no. 2619/05, 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland, no. 648/02, 6 July 2010, Subicka v. Poland, no. 29342/06, 14 September 2010, Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010, Slowik v. Poland, no. 31477/05, 12 April 2011, Subicka v. Poland (n° 2) nos.
  • EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23987/05

    KOWALCZYK v. POLAND

    Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009, Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009, Zapadka v. Poland, no. 2619/05, 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland, no. 648/02, 6 July 2010, Subicka v. Poland, no. 29342/06, 14 September 2010, Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010, Slowik v. Poland, no. 31477/05, 12 April 2011, Subicka v. Poland (n° 2) nos.
  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 22980/09

    OMEROVIC v. CROATIA (No. 2)

    In this connection, a requirement that an appellant be represented by a qualified lawyer before the court of cassation appeal, as in the present case, cannot in itself be seen as contrary to Article 6. This requirement is clearly compatible with the characteristics of the Supreme Court as the highest court examining appeals on points of law, and it is a common feature of the legal systems in several member States of the Council of Europe (see Gillow v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, § 69; Vacher v. France, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, pp. 2148-49, §§ 24 and 28; and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 24197/10

    MUSCAT v. MALTA

    In discharging its obligation to provide parties to civil proceedings with legal aid, when it is provided by domestic law, the State must display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see, inter alia, Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, § 129, 22 March 2007; Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, § 106, 22 March 2007; and Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, § 46, 12 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 34043/05

    SUBICKA v. POLAND (No. 2)

    Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009, Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009, Zapadka v. Poland, no. 2619/05, 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland, no. 648/02, 6 July 2010, Subicka v. Poland, no. 29342/06, 14 Septembre 2010, Bakowska v. Poland, no. 33539/02, 12 January 2010, Slowik v. Poland, no. 31477/05, 12 April 2011.
  • EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 53526/18

    N.L. c. FRANCE

    La Cour rappelle également que les parties sont tenues d'accomplir avec diligence les actes de procédure relatifs à leur affaire (Unión Alimentaria Sanders S.A. c. Espagne, 7 juillet 1989, § 35, Série A no 157, Teuschler c. Allemagne (déc.), no 47636/99, 4 octobre 2001, et Bakowska c. Pologne, no 33539/02, § 54, 12 janvier 2010).
  • EGMR, 23.09.2021 - 12210/14

    DYLUS c. POLOGNE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht