Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62418) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BABAT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 2 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97
SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95
ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95
FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
- EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 28298/95
BULDAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
As regards pecuniary damages, the Court reiterates that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in appropriate cases, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Tanıs and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 231, ECHR 2005-VIII). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02
GONGADZE c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
It further repeats that a State's procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention is not an obligation of result, but of means (see among others Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, § 176, ECHR 2005-XI). - EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39541/98
DÖLEK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007). - EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44936/04
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning a State's obligations under Article 2 of the Convention under both its substantive and procedural limbs (see, in particular, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no. 324; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135-136, 16 July 2002; Shanaghan v. the United Kingdom, no. 37715/97, §§ 85-92, 4 May 2001; Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2003-VIII; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-..., and Dölek v. Turkey, no. 39541/98, §§ 70-75, 2 October 2007).
- EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 50375/07
VAZAGASHVILI AND SHANAVA v. GEORGIA
It concludes, therefore, that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the applicants" remaining complaints (see, amongst many other authorities, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Gulyan v. Armenia, no. 11244/12, § 95, 20 September 2018; and Babat and Others v. Turkey, no. 44936/04, § 44, 12 January 2010). - EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 6414/02
KOSEVA v. BULGARIA
Furthermore, the obligation to investigate is not one of result, but of means only (see, as a recent authority, Babat and Others v. Turkey, no. 44936/04, § 39, 12 January 2010, with further references).