Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 2027/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,58397) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MITTERBAUER v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 2027/06
However, this general rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51; Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001; and Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X).
- EGMR, 05.04.2016 - 33060/10
Vertretungsverbot gegen einen Anwalt ohne vorherige Durchführung einer mündlichen …
However, a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him of his status as a victim, unless the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way and then afforded redress for the breach of the Convention (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 179-180, ECHR 2006-V; and Mitterbauer v. Austria (dec.), no. 2027/06, 12 February 2009). - EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13665/09
OBRIST v. AUSTRIA
However, a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him of his status as a victim, unless the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006-V and Mitterbauer v. Austria (dec.), no. 2027/06, 12 February 2009).