Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DENISENKO AND BOGDANCHIKOV v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 37810/03

  BAGEL v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  The Government did not contest the assertion that on the days of court hearings the first applicant left the remand centre before breakfast and did not return there until after dinner (see Vlasov v. Russia, no. 78146/01, § 96, 12 June 2008; compare Starokadomskiy, cited above, § 58; see, by contrast, Bagel v. Russia, no. 37810/03, § 69, 15 November 2007).
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 29787/03

  RIAD ET IDIAB c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  In connection with its findings above, the Court would emphasise that it considers it unacceptable for a person to be detained in conditions in which no provision is made for meeting his or her basic needs (see Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 106, ECHR 2008-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94

  Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  An applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III, and Günaydin v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27526/95, 25 April 2002).

 
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see, among many other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim's conduct (see, among many other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  Finally, there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results; in particular, in all cases, the complainant must be afforded effective access to the investigatory procedure (see, among many other authorities, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, §§ 102 et seq., Reports 1998-VIII; Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, §§ 107-108, 26 January 2006; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 137, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts); and Petropoulou-Tsakiris v. Greece, no. 44803/04, § 50, 6 December 2007).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  The Court further reiterates that the assessment of the level of severity of a given form of treatment is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the gender, age and state of health of the victim (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 100-101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 27526/95

  GÜNAYDIN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  An applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III, and Günaydin v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27526/95, 25 April 2002).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  Treatment has been considered "degrading" when it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them and possibly breaking their moral resistance, or when it was such as to drive the victim to act against his will or conscience (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 6846/02

  KHAMILA ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 44803/04

  PETROPOULOU-TSAKIRIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 24650/02

  GULIYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 62936/00

  MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

• EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09

  BOUYID v. BELGIUM

  In examining them it may take account of the quality of the domestic proceedings and any possible flaws in the decision-making process (see Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no. 3811/02, § 83, 12 February 2009).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Il mentionne à cet égard l'arrêt Denissenko et Bogdantchikov c. Russie (no 3811/02, §§ 106-110, 12 février 2009), qui concernait les conditions de détention dans le même tribunal.
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 1653/13

  Spanien verurteilt: ETA-Terroristen unmenschlich behandelt

  Pour ce faire, elle peut prendre en compte la qualité de la procédure interne et toute déficience propre à vicier le processus décisionnel (Denissenko et Bogdantchikov c. Russie, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 février 2009, et Bouyid, précité, § 85).

 
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 29272/08

  ÖZEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Pour ce faire, elle peut prendre en compte la qualité de la procédure interne et toute déficience propre à vicier le processus décisionnel (Denissenko et Bogdantchikov c. Russie, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 février 2009, et Bouyid, précité, § 85).
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02

  ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA

  She has not put forward any convincing argument suggesting that the arrangements made by the national authorities for feeding detainees, including herself, amounted to a form of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the Convention (see, in a similar context, Vlasov v. Russia, no. 78146/01, §§ 93-99, 12 June 2008; Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no. 3811/02, §§ 106-10, 12 February 2009; and Svetlana Kazmina v. Russia, no. 8609/04, §§ 76-79, 2 December 2010).
• EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23524/14

  MÎTU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In examining them it may take account of the quality of the domestic proceedings and any possible flaws in the decision-making process (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 85, ECHR 2015, and also Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no. 3811/02, § 83, 12 February 2009).
• EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 8494/07

  POLAT c. TURQUIE

  Pour ce faire, elle peut prendre en compte la qualité de la procédure interne et toute déficience propre à vicier le processus décisionnel (Denissenko et Bogdantchikov c. Russie, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 février 2009, et Bouyid, précité, § 85).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 6644/08

  FIRAT CAN v. TURKEY

  It reiterates in this connection that where an individual is taken into police custody or arrives otherwise under the control of the authorities in good health and is found to be injured while in detention or under their control, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-11, Series A no. 241-A; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; and Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no. 3811/02, § 82, 12 February 2009).
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 53343/19

  KAYUMOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court is prepared to accept that the seriousness of the alleged crime and the applicant's conduct could reasonably constitute sufficient factual grounds justifying his pre-trial detention for about three months (see Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no. 3811/02, §§ 128-37, 12 February 2009, and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 88, 12 June 2014).