Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 152/04   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2013,1381
EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 152/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1381)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.02.2013 - 152/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1381)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Februar 2013 - 152/04 (https://dejure.org/2013,1381)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,1381) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    YEFIMENKO v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-a - Competent court) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (22)

  • EGMR, 20.10.2016 - 7334/13

    MURSIC c. CROATIE

    Accordingly, in a number of post-Ananyev cases concerning various factual circumstances, the Court consistently examined the cumulative effects of the conditions of detention before reaching a final conclusion as to the alleged violation of Article 3 on account of prison overcrowding (see, for example, Idalov, cited above, § 101; Iacov Stanciu, cited above, §§ 176-178; Asyanov v. Russia, no. 25462/09, § 43, 9 October 2012; Nieciecki v. Greece, no. 11677/11, §§ 49-51, 4 December 2012; Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, §§ 80-84, 12 February 2013; Manulin v. Russia, no. 26676/06, §§ 47-48, 11 April 2013; Shishkov v. Russia, no. 26746/05, §§ 90-94, 20 February 2014; Bulatovic v. Montenegro, no. 67320/10, §§ 123-127, 22 July 2014; Tomoiaga v. Romania (dec.), no. 47775/10, §§ 22-23, 20 January 2015; Neshkov and Others, cited above, §§ 246-256; Varga and Others, cited above, § 88; and Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos.
  • EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

    ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    152/04.
  • EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 75947/11

    Russland verurteilt: Recht auf freie Wahl verletzt

    The expression "any form of pressure" must be taken to cover not only direct coercion and flagrant acts of intimidation of applicants or their legal representatives but also other improper indirect acts or instances of contact designed to dissuade or discourage them from pursuing a Convention remedy or having a "chilling effect" on the exercise of the right of individual petition by applicants and their representatives (see Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, § 48, 13 April 2006; Mechenkov v. Russia, no. 35421/05, § 116, 7 February 2008; and Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, § 164, 12 February 2013).
  • EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08

    TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    However, where a person has already spent time in detention on the basis of a decision that contained a "gross and obvious irregularity", it can likely be concluded that the intervening period of detention was in breach of Article 5 § 1 (see for comparison Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, §§ 89-111, 12 February 2013, with further references; Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, §§ 91-95, 30 May 2013; Kleyn v. Russia, no. 44925/06, §§ 28-29, 5 January 2016; Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no. 6287/10, §§ 112-17, 17 March 2016; and Gumeniuc v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 48829/06, §§ 25-26, 16 May 2017).
  • EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 33761/05

    TERESHCHENKO v. RUSSIA

    Being the master of the characterisation in law to be given to the facts of the case (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, 17 September 2009), and having regard to the nature of the interference and the contents of the applicant's submissions, the Court considers that the matters relating to the correspondence between the applicant and the Court raise issues under both Articles 8 and 34 of the Convention (see Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, §§ 152-153, 12 February 2013).
  • EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 42615/06

    VARNAS v. LITHUANIA

    Complaints about the conditions of detention must be lodged within six months of the end of the situation complained about or, if there is an available domestic remedy, of the final decision in the process of exhaustion (see, most recently, Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, § 72, 12 February 2013).
  • EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 61064/10

    IVASHCHENKO v. RUSSIA

    In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by the Convention (see, in the context of decisions relating to town and country planning policies, Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I, and in other contexts: Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 99, ECHR 2003-VIII; Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 147, ECHR 2014 (extracts); see also Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, §§ 85-86, 26 July 2011; Gablishvili v. Russia, no. 39428/12, § 48, 26 June 2014; Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, §§ 146-50, 12 February 2013, and Lashmankin and Others, cited above, § 418).
  • EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 6287/10

    HAMMERTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    As it did in Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, § 104, 12 February 2013, the Court will apply the principles set out in Mooren by the Grand Chamber, which have been considered in paragraphs 95-96 and 100-104 above.
  • EGMR, 24.05.2018 - 28798/13

    LAURENT c. FRANCE

    C'est donc la confidentialité de tous les échanges auxquels les individus peuvent se livrer à des fins de communication qui se trouve garantie par l'article 8 y compris lorsque l'envoyeur ou le destinataire est un détenu (Silver et autres c. Royaume-Uni, 25 mars 1983, § 84, série A no 61, Mehmet Nuri Özen et autres c. Turquie, nos 15672/08 et 10 autres, § 41, 11 janvier 2011, et Yefimenko c. Russie, no 152/04, § 144, 12 février 2013).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 43083/06

    ZOLOTAREV c. RUSSIE

    Dans ses arrêts précédents, la Cour a considéré que les agissements susmentionnés constituaient des exemples d'une entrave prohibée par la seconde phrase de l'article 34 de la Convention (Yefimenko c. Russie, no 152/04, §§ 161-165, 12 février 2013, Fetisov et autres c. Russie, nos 43710/07, 6023/08, 11248/08, 27668/08, 31242/08 et 52133/08, §§ 142-145, 17 janvier 2012, et Kopanitsyn c. Russie, no 43231/04, § 43, 12 mars 2015).
  • EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04

    SHEKHOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 70243/11

    DZASOKHOV v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 63392/09

    SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 20489/07

    URUKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 44925/06

    KLEYN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 43231/04

    KOPANITSYN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 586/08 (anhängig)

    YANCHURKIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72885/10

    KOLESIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

    YELISEYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 3945/10 (anhängig)

    SUKHONOSOVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 41671/15 (anhängig)

    RUDYKH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 30877/16 (anhängig)

    ZHIVITSA v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht