Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19136/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,50967) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KALINICHENKO v. RUSSIA
(englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95
PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19136/04
The Government, relying on the Court's judgments in the cases of Pellegrin v. France ([GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999-VIII) and Kanayev v. Russia (no. 43726/02, 27 July 2006), argued that the applicant's complaint under Article 6 of the Convention was incompatible ratione materiae because the applicant had been a military officer at the material time and the judgment award had concerned allowances for his military service. - EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99
NIKITINE c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19136/04
The Court has to assess whether the power to conduct a supervisory review was exercised by the authorities so as to strike, to the maximum extent possible, a fair balance between the interests of the individual and the need to ensure the proper administration of justice (see, mutatis mutandis, Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 57 and 59, ECHR 2004-VIII). - EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 43726/02
KANAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19136/04
The Government, relying on the Court's judgments in the cases of Pellegrin v. France ([GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999-VIII) and Kanayev v. Russia (no. 43726/02, 27 July 2006), argued that the applicant's complaint under Article 6 of the Convention was incompatible ratione materiae because the applicant had been a military officer at the material time and the judgment award had concerned allowances for his military service.