Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,57125) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 2929/05
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 42987/98
VACHEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05
The existence of the remedy required by Article 5 § 4 must be sufficiently certain, not only in theory but also in practice, failing which it will lack the accessibility and effectiveness required for the purposes of that provision (see, mutatis mutandis, Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 66 in fine, 24 March 2005, and Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts)).The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 of the Convention is complied with where it is possible to apply for compensation in respect of a deprivation of liberty effected in conditions contrary to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 or 4 (see Wassink v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 185-A, p. 14, § 38, and Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 79, ECHR 2004-... (extracts)).
- EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91
QUINN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05
Therefore, Article 5 § 1 (c) and, accordingly, Article 5 § 3 of the Convention are not applicable in the present case (see Quinn v. France, judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, § 53). - EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 9808/02
STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05
The existence of the remedy required by Article 5 § 4 must be sufficiently certain, not only in theory but also in practice, failing which it will lack the accessibility and effectiveness required for the purposes of that provision (see, mutatis mutandis, Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 66 in fine, 24 March 2005, and Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts)).