Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 17114/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,7632) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TELERADIOKOMPANIYA NBM v. UKRAINE
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 17114/08
The complaints intended to be lodged with the Court should have been raised before the domestic judicial authorities, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96
COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 17114/08
Also, in countries where the law is codified, the organisation of the judicial system cannot be left to the discretion of the judicial authorities, although this does not mean that the courts do not have some latitude to interpret relevant domestic legislation (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, no. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 98, ECHR 2000-VII and Savino and Others v. Italy, no. 17214/05 and 2 others, § 94, 28 April 2009). - EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 6778/05
MPP GOLUB c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 17114/08
A failure to comply with such requirements may lead to a finding that domestic remedies have not been exhausted (see, among many other authorities, MPP Golub v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 6778/05, ECHR 2005-XI). - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 17214/05
Savino ./. Italien / Persichetti ./. Italien
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 17114/08
Also, in countries where the law is codified, the organisation of the judicial system cannot be left to the discretion of the judicial authorities, although this does not mean that the courts do not have some latitude to interpret relevant domestic legislation (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, no. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 98, ECHR 2000-VII and Savino and Others v. Italy, no. 17214/05 and 2 others, § 94, 28 April 2009).