Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 14+P1-1 Non-lieu à examiner le statut de victime des troisième quatrième et cinquième requérants (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 14+P1-1 Not necessary to examine victim status of third fourth and fifth applicants (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  Stec und andere gegen das Vereinigte Königreich

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 65731/01
• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01 und 65900/01

Wird zitiert von ... (175)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EuGH, 23.05.2000 - C-196/98

  Hepple u.a.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  In the present applicants" case, C-196/98 Hepple and Others v. Adjudication Officer [2000] ECR I-3701, the ECJ applied the reasoning of Evelyn Thomas and Others to find, first, that "removal of the discrimination at issue... would have no effect on the financial equilibrium of the social security system of the United Kingdom as a whole" (§ 29).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  As a general rule, very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before the Court could regard a difference in treatment based exclusively on the ground of sex as compatible with the Convention (see Van Raalte, cited above, § 39, and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 67, Series A no. 263).
• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  On the other hand, a wide margin is usually allowed to the State under the Convention when it comes to general measures of economic or social strategy (see, for example, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98, and National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports 1997-VII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

  THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  34-35, § 10, Series A no. 6, and Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 12.11.2008 - 34503/97

  Demir und Baykara ./. Türkei - Streikrecht für Beamte

  65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 47-48, ECHR 2005-X).
• BVerfG, 16.12.2021 - 1 BvR 1541/20

  Der Gesetzgeber muss Vorkehrungen zum Schutz behinderter Menschen für den Fall …

  Danach müssen auch staatliche Leistungen diskriminierungsfrei gewährt werden (vgl. EGMR , Stec et al. v. the United Kingdom, Urteil vom 12. April 2006, Nr. 65731/01 und 65900/01, § 53).
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11

  MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY

  65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 47-48, ECHR 2005-X, and Rantsev, cited above, § 274).

 
• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08

  Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer …

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 40, ECHR 2005-X; and Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 78, Series A no. 94).

  This could easily be justified in the light of the Court's case-law, which is based on the idea that "very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before the Court could regard a difference in treatment based exclusively on the ground of sex as compatible with the Convention" (see Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1997, § 39, in fine, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 37, Reports 1998-II; and Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2006-VI).

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2005-X; and Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos.

  65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2006-VI.

• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 57813/00

  S.H. u. a. ./. Österreich

  The Contracting State enjoys a margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2006-VI; Burden, cited above, § 60).

  Even if that is the case, the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation when assessing whether and to what extent a different treatment is justified, (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2006-VI, Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008-...).

• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04

  RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 23459/03

  BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA

  La lecture que l'arrêt en propose va à l'encontre de l'approche traditionnelle de la Cour suivant laquelle la Convention doit également se lire comme un tout et s'interpréter de manière à promouvoir sa cohérence interne et l'harmonie entre ses diverses dispositions (voir Klass et autres c. Allemagne, 6 septembre 1978, § 68, série A no 28, et également Maaouia c. France [GC], no 39652/98, § 36, CEDH 2000-X, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 152, CEDH 2000-XI, et Stec et autres c. Royaume-Uni (déc.) [GC], nos 65731/01 et 65900/01, § 48, CEDH 2005-X).
• EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18

  Familiennachzug bei subsidiärem Schutz: Kompromiss zwischen Menschenrechten und …

  Il y a lieu de rappeler que la Convention doit se lire comme un tout et s'interpréter de manière à promouvoir sa cohérence interne et l'harmonie entre ses diverses dispositions (Stec et autres c. Royaume-Uni (déc.) [GC], nos 65731/01 et 65900/01, § 48, CEDH 2005-X).
• EGMR, 22.03.2012 - 30078/06

  Konstantin Markin ./. Russland

  Positive discrimination measures had to be proportionately tailored to the aim of correcting, compensating for, or mitigating the continuing effects of a hardship suffered by a historically disadvantaged group, such as women (see Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949/98 and 53134/99, §§ 37 and 40-43, 10 May 2007, and Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, §§ 61 and 66, ECHR 2006-VI).

  [17] See Case "relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium" (merits), 23 July 1968, p. 34, § 10, Series A no. 6 ("certain legal inequalities tend only to correct factual inequalities"), Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, §§ 51 and 66, ECHR 2006-VI, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 175, 181-182, ECHR 2007-IV, Orsus and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766/03, §§ 147-148, 182, ECHR 2010, Andrle v. the Czech Republic, no. 6268/08, § 48, 17 February 2011, and Oyal v. Turkey, no. 4864/05, 23 March 2010.

• EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 13378/05

  Burden und Burden ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 39, ECHR 2005-X).

  The Contracting State enjoys a margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment, and this margin is usually wide when it comes to general measures of economic or social strategy (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51-52, ECHR 2006-VI).

  65731/01 and 65900/01, 6 July 2006, § 55 in fine).

• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 21881/20

  COMMUNAUTÉ GENEVOISE D'ACTION SYNDICALE (CGAS) c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 37452/02

  STUMMER c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 53124/09

  GENOVESE v. MALTA
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 22341/09

  Flüchtling, Heirat, Familienzusammenführung, Familiennachzug, Ehegattennachzug, …
• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63066/14

  Schuldenschnitt in Griechenland: Die Umschuldung war legal
• EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04

  Transnistrien
• EGMR, 16.07.2014 - 37359/09

  HÄMÄLÄINEN c. FINLANDE
• EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 7205/07

  CLIFT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 07.02.2013 - 16574/08

  FABRIS c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 7186/09

  DI TRIZIO c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11

  HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 5335/05

  PONOMARYOVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 42184/05

  CARSON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43134/05

  G.N. u.a. ./. Italien
• EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 17120/09

  DHAHBI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 56328/07

  BAH c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 78630/12

  BEELER v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 49270/11

  SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 35214/09

  ALDEGUER TOMÁS v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 42949/98

  RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 49151/07

  Muñoz Diaz ./. Spanien
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 76943/11

  PAROISSE GRÉCO-CATHOLIQUE LUPENI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 23682/13

  GUBERINA v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 53080/13

  BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 3976/05

  SERIFE YIGIT c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 24120/06

  Weigerung deutscher Gerichte, Nachkommen der Opfer von Waffen-SS-Massaker in …
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 65550/13

  BELLI ET ARQUIER-MARTINEZ c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 13341/14

  DA SILVA CARVALHO RICO v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 62235/12

  DA CONCEIÇÃO MATEUS AND SANTOS JANUÁRIO v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 5591/07

  ALLEN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 13378/05

  BURDEN ET BURDEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 51362/09

  TADDEUCCI ET McCALL c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 37060/06

  J.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 17966/10

  MANZANAS MARTIN c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 26266/05

  Raviv ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 63684/00

  HOBBS, RICHARD, WALSH AND GEEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 06.11.2017 - 43494/09

  GARIB c. PAYS-BAS
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 17767/08

  KHONIAKINA v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 36571/06

  B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 7710/02

  GRZELAK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 26713/05

  BIGAEVA c. GRECE
• EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 19728/02

  AKGÜL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 24.05.2022 - 19839/21

  L.F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 33631/06

  VROUNTOU v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 15189/10

  CICHOPEK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49372/10

  Contergan-Skandal
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 16264/07

  PAILLET c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 30614/06

  IWASZKIEWICZ v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 25379/02

  TWIZELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 33014/08

  RYON ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 11146/11

  HORVÁTH AND KISS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 25409/04

  CAYTAS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 77782/01

  LUCZAK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 38590/10

  BIAO v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34538/08

  GRENECHE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 20511/04

  PURICEL v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 14717/04

  BERGER-KRALL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 18984/02

  P.B. AND J.S. v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2021 - 15379/16

  ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 15766/03

  Oršuš u.a. ./. Kroatien
• EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 30078/06

  KONSTANTIN MARKIN c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 26828/06

  MAKUC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 16986/12

  ALEXANDRU ENACHE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 14497/06

  WALLISHAUSER v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 37359/09

  H. c. FINLANDE
• EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 64480/19

  MORARU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 33139/13

  NAPOTNIK v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 9134/06

  EFE v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 46286/09

  MAGGIO AND OTHERS v. ITALY
• EGMR, 17.02.2011 - 6268/08

  ANDRLE v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05

  RASMUSSEN v. POLAND
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 42184/05

  Carson et autres ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 49646/10

  LESSING AND REICHELT v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 17972/07

  ARRAS AND OTHERS v. ITALY
• EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 27458/06

  LAKICEVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 17854/04

  SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 18176/05

  WIECZOREK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 10373/05

  MOSKAL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 26944/13

  POPOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 29334/06

  KOSTKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 31438/06

  KADLUCZKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 54805/15

  ZEGARAC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 23.04.2019 - 42447/10

  ELISEI-UZUN AND ANDONIE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 25.01.2007 - 70160/01

  AON CONSEIL ET COURTAGE S.A. AND CHRISTIAN DE CLARENS S.A. v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 34880/12

  RAMAER AND VAN WILLIGEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 16574/08

  FABRIS v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 36137/04

  KROSTA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 8585/13

  PIEKARSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 6287/10

  HAMMERTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 50636/09

  MARIJA BOZIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 36181/05

  GALINA KOSTOVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 10441/06

  PICHKUR v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 34799/07

  PEJCIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 49407/08

  VARESI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 38677/06

  BUDCHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 52943/10

  DAMJANAC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 13902/11

  PANFILE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 23851/20

  X AND OTHERS v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 74734/14

  SAUMIER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36918/11

  ARNAUD ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 77575/11

  MARKOVICS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 23.01.2014 - 62170/10

  MONTOYA c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 28233/08

  KUDUMIJA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND SERBIA AND REMENOVIC AND MASOVIC v. BOSNIA …
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 10781/10

  MISICK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 41285/02

  SZAL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 20870/04

  BELKA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 25168/05

  CZEKIEN v. POLAND
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 48775/06

  REVELIOTIS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 45769/06

  KOKKINIS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 9717/05

  EPSTEIN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 69524/01

  BULGAKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 2033/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 69424/16

  DENYSIUK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18

  MORARU AND MARIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 40676/11

  SPIRIDONOVSKA AND POPOVSKI v.
• EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 31818/10

  GÖKSEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 41971/11

  LEBEDINSCHI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 33705/09

  CANAJ v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 4519/11

  FAKAS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 11838/07

  TORRI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 22350/10

  FURTSEV v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 20844/09

  HASANI v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 16149/08

  ZUBCZEWSKI v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 67070/01

  SALI v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 47267/16

  ARBIB c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 53068/08

  FEDULOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 77664/14

  REIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  ÖZ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 68385/10

  SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 54704/10

  SEREBRYANSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 51391/08

  GALLEZ ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE ET VERHAEGEN c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 28256/06

  TES ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 50166/08

  CORBLET DE FALLERANS c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3205/03

  CROITORU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 34726/04

  SPRINGETT and OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 20672/05

  EL ORABI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 648/06

  SHIMIDZU AND BERLLAQUE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 28456/03

  KORELC v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 2600/04

  KALKANLI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 06.01.2009 - 24821/03

  RATA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 13913/05

  COLLINGBORN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 11581/02

  DICKIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 30698/04

  VAVRENYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 20889/02

  NESTOROVYCH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 67171/01

  HAMPEK v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 38139/05

  MAMONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 32522/19

  NECHYPORENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 4723/13

  BERISHA c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47520/16

  KOMLENAC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 11944/16

  MILIVOJEVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 68320/13

  SPOLJAR AND DJECJI VRTIC PCELICE v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 12509/13

  PANAYOTOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 41069/11

  GOURI c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 43331/12

  VELIKODA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 16861/08

  SÁL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 04.01.2012 - 68726/10

  BABENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 14480/08

  TARKOEV AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 04.05.2010 - 21990/08

  PETERKA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 4999/06

  TSARKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 46125/06

  BLADH v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 63468/00

  GEEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 14198/02

  TATENKO v. UKRAINE